Policy Advocacy for The Elimination of Patent Maintenance Fee at Entrepreneurial University

Ima Mayasari

  Abstract


Advocating for the ellimination of patent maintanance feees in Higher Education, especially for Entrepreneurial Universities (EU), is essential. The number of patents is the primary indicator in determining the most innovative university. Therefore, the Minister of Law and Human Rights in 2020 adapted by issuing Permenkumham 20/2020 concerning Requirements and Procedures for Imposing Certain Tariffs on Patent and Copyright. According to Permenkumham 20/2020, in some instances, tariffs on patent services can be imposed in the amount of zero rupiahs, including for Higher Education. The research problem is How to advocate for a policy to eliminate patent maintenance fees at an EU?. This research aims to analyze Policy Advocacy for the Elimination of Patent Maintenance Fees at EU. This study uses the Advocacy Strategy Framework concept proposed by Coffman. The research employs a qualitative research method. The results of the research show that the Advocacy Strategy Framework regarding the Elimination of Patent Maintenance Costs in Permenkumham Number 20/2020 is carried out through three changes, Awareness, Will, and Action carried out to audiences, namely Public and Influencers; Influencers; Influencers and Decision Makers; and Decision Makers. The researcher recommends to the Ministry of Law to compile a Roadmap and Action Plan regarding Elimination of Patent Maintenance Costs in Policy Products in the form of Ministerial Decrees Law and Human Rights or Decision of the Director General of IP regarding the Roadmap and/or Action Plan regarding this matter.


  Keywords


Patents; Patent Maintenance Fee; Policy Advocacy; Entrepreneurial University.

  Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

  References


Boulanger, Julian. 2019. “Patents and Follow-On Innovation: Evidence From Patent Renewal Decisions.” SSRN 1-47.

Choi, Jaewoong, Byeongki Jeong, Janghyeok Yoon , Byoung-Youl Coh, and Jae-Min Lee. 2020. “A novel approach to evaluating the business potential of intellectual properties: A machine learning-based predictive analysis of patent lifetime.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 1-13. doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106544.

Coffman, Julia. 2008. Foundations and Public Policy Grantmaking. The James Irvine Foundation. https:// www.issuelab.org/resources/1349/1349.pdf.

Coffman, Julia , and Tanya Beer. 2015. “The Advocacy Strategy Framework.” Center for Evaluation Innovation. Maret. https://www.evaluationinnovation.org/publication/the-advocacy-strategy-framework-3/.

Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO . 2019. Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating Healthy Lives — The Future of Medical Innovation. (Geneva: WIPO).

Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. 2020. Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? (Geneva: WIPO).

Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approach. (California: Sage Publications, Inc).

Davis, Kevin, Angelina Fisher, Benedict Kingsbury, and Sally Engle Merry, . 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings . (England: Oxford University Press).

Erdil, E., Meissner, D., Chataway, J. 2018. Innovation Ecosystems and Universities. In: Meissner, D., Erdil, E., Chataway, J. (eds) Innovation and the Entrepreneurial University. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62649-9_1.

Ewalt, David M. 2019. Europe’s Most Innovative Universities 2019. October 23. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/EUROPE-UNIVERSITY-INNOVATION/010091N02HR/index.html.

Feola, Rosangela, Roberto Parente, and Cucino Valentina. 2021. “The Entrepreneurial University: How to Develop the Entrepreneurial Orientation of Academia.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 12: 1-22. doi:10.1007/s13132-020-00675-9 .

Heim, Irina. 2023. Intellectual Property Management. Springer Books.

Neuman, W Lawrence. 2014. Basics of Social Research: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. In Pearson Education Limited. (England: Pearson Education Limited).

Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 20 Tahun 2020 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengenaan Tarif Tertentu pada Pelayanan Paten dan Hak Cipta, Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 833 Tahun 2020.

Reuters. 2019. Reuters Top 100: Europe’s Most Innovative Universities 2019 announced. April 30. https:// www.reuters.com/article/rpbtop1002019-idUSKCN1S60PA.

Roger, Charles. 2023. The Origins of Informality: Why the Legal Foundations of Global Governance are Shifting, and Why It Matters. (England: Oxford University Press). doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780190947965.001.0001.

Tahmooresnejad, Leila, and Catherine Beaudry. 2018. “Do patents of academic funded researchers enjoy a longer life? A study of patent renewal decisions.” PLOS One 1-22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202643.

WIPO. 2021. Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking innovation through the COVID-19 crisis. (Geneva: World Intellectual).

WIPO. 2022. Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? (Geneva: World Intellectual).


  Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 443 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 15 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 391 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.255-268

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ima Mayasari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Indexed by :

                

Complete list


Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Statistic