Procedural Justice or Substantive Justice: Review of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/Puu/Xviii/2020

Samuel Hamonangan Simanjuntak; Lita Tyesta A.L.W.

doi:10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.341-362

Procedural Justice or Substantive Justice: Review of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/Puu/Xviii/2020

Samuel Hamonangan Simanjuntak, Lita Tyesta A.L.W.

Abstract

The formal test application of the Omnibus Law of Job Creation through the Constitutional Court Decision Number:91/PUU-XVIII/2020, in its statement the Constitutional Court declared its unconstitutional conditional. The Constitutional Court decision was made because considering the need to balance the formal and the strategic objectives of the establishment of the Job Creation Law, the formal condition is procedural justice while the strategic objective is substantive justice. The decision raised the question of whether the verdict was oriented to procedural justice or substantive justice. Research question of the study was what is the Orientation of Justice of the Constitutional Court Decision Number:91/PUU-XVIII/2020? This study is on normative law research. The postpositvism paradigm used a qualitative approach through the in concreto study of and court behaviour. The results of the study are the Constitutional Court Decision Number:91/PUU-XVIII/2020 through its considerations, opinions and verdicts in the main application oriented to procedural justice. It can be concluded that The Decree of Constitutional Court Decision Number:91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is oriented to procedural justice. The study recommends, in line with the principle of justice of John Rawls, the basic legal values of Gustav Radbruch and the social justice value of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, formal test on Omnibus Law of Kob Creation should have been rejected, and made substantive justice orientation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number:91/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Keywords

Constitutional Court decision Number: 91/PUU-XVIII/2020; procedural justice; substantive justice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books

Alfian, Oetojo Oesman. Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Dalam Berbagai Bidang Kehidupan Bermasyarakat, Berbangsa Dan Bernegara. Surabaya: Karya Anda, 1983.

Asshiddiqqie, Jimly. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.

Asshiddiqqie, Jimly. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016.

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede. Filsafat Hukum, Dimensi Tematis dan Historis. Malang: Setara Press, 2013.

Black, Henry Campbell. Black Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. ST. Paul Minn: West Publishing CO., 1968.

Friedrich, Carl Joachim. The Philosophy of Law in Historical Perspective. 1995. Terjemahan, Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia, 2004.

Hujibers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintas Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kansius, 1982.

Kusumohamidjojo, Budiono. Teori Hukum: Dilema Antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2016.

Notonegoro. Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1983.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum. Jakarta: Kompas, 2008.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.

Rawls, John. A theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,1971.

Rubaie, Ach. Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstiotusi: Perspektif Filosofis, Teoritis, dan Yuridis. Surabaya: LaksBang, 2017.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Suteki, dan Galang Taufani. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Suwarno, P. J. Pancasila Budaya Bangsa Indonesia, Peneltian Pancasila Dengan Pendekatan Historis, Filosofis & Sosio-Yuridis Kenegaraan. Yogyakarta: Kansius, 1993.

Tanya, Bernard L., eds. Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.

Journal

Aditya, Zaka Firma dan Abdul Basid Fuadi. “Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law Dalam Pemindahan Ibukota Negara.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 15, no. 1 (2021): 149 - 164.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.149-164

Ardiansyah, Mohammad Kamil. “Pembaruan Hukum Oleh Mahkamah Agung Dalam Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 2 (2020): 361 - 384.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.361-384

Aziz, Machmud. “Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 5 (2010): 113 – 150.

https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/248

Beni Kurniawan, M. “Politik Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Status Anak Di Luar Nikah: Penerapan Hukum Progresif Sebagai Perlindungan Hak Asasi Anak.” Jurnal HAM 8, no. 1 (2017): 67 – 78.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2017.8.67-78

Cakra, I Putu Eka dan Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Kompabilitas Penerapan Konsep Omnibus Law Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Crepido 2, no. 2 (2020): 59 – 69.

https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.2.2.59-69

Ginting, Eriko Fahri dan Dian Agung Wicaksono. “Dualisme Kewenangan Pengawasan Rancangan Peraturan Daerah Oleh Pemerintah Pusat Dan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 3 (2020): 403 - 418.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.403-418

Huda, Miftakhul. “Pola Pelanggaran Pemilukada Dan Perluasan Keadilan Substantif.” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 2 (2010): 113 – 160.

https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/166

Kristiyanto, Eko Noer. “Urgensi Omnibus Law Dalam Percepatan Reformasi Regulasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 233 - 244.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.233-244

Lailam, Tanto. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman Dalam Perlindungan Hak Fundamental Warga Negara Berdasarkan Kewenangan Pengaduan Konstitusional.” Jurnal HAM 13, no. 1 (2022): 65 - 80.

https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/ham/article/view/2357

Pasaribu, Alboin dan Intan Permata Putri. “Prosepek Penjatuhan Putusan Provisi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1 (2021): 44 – 65.

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1813

Putri, Dewi Sartika. “Penerapan Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja di Indonesia Efektif atau Tidak? Studi Tinjauan Berdasarkan Sistem Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 2, (2021): 523 – 540.

http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/3064

Suntoro, Agus. “Implementasi Pencapaian Secara Progresif Dalam Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal HAM 12, no. 1 (2021): 1 - 18.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.1-18

Supriyadi dan Andi Intan Purnamasari. “Gagasan Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 15, no. 2 (2021): 257 - 270.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.257-270

Tan, Winsherly dan Dyah Putri Ramadhani. “Pemenuhan Hak Bekerja Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Fisik di Kota Batam.” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (2020): 27 - 37.

http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.27-37

Triningsih, Anna dan Oly Viana Agustine. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Memuat Keadilan Sosial Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2019): 835 – 860.

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1648

Ulil Aedi, Ahmad, Sakti Lazuardi, dan Ditta Chandra Putri. “Arsitektur Penerapan Omnibus Law Melalui Transplantasi Hukum Nasional Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 1 (2020), 1 - 18.

https://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.1-18

Legislations

THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Making

Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation

The Constitutional Court Regulation Number 06/PMK/2005 on The Procedures of Judicial Review of Law.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009.

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-VII/2009.

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 133/PUU-VII/2009.

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 20/PUU-XVII/2019.

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Internet

https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.RekapPUU&menu=4, accessed on 31 November 2021.

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5f8e4201deea4/tantangan-pengujian-proses-legislasi-di-mahkamah-konstitusi?page=2, accessed on 31 November 2021.

Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 962 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 553 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.341-362