The Urgency of Regulating Injunctions In Indonesian Civil Procedure Bill

I Gusti Ngurah Anom Manacika Mahawijaya, Febrilian Dame Nuraldi, Michael Sebastian Chang

  Abstract


The concept of injunction in common law countries is similar to the concept of provision, confiscation, and provisional determination so that the concept of injunction can be used to complete the deficiencies of provision, confiscation, and provisional determination. This research examines injunction arrangements in common law countries, in this case, the United States and Singapore, which are then transplanted into Indonesian law through the Indonesian Civil Procedure Bill. The research method was carried out normatively and then explained descriptively accompanied by a prescription on how provision, confiscation, and provisional determination should be regulated in Indonesia. Arrangements for provision, confiscation, and provisional determination are still scattered in various laws and even most of the Dutch colonial legacies are used without an official translation. This condition causes legal uncertainty that can be detrimental to justice seekers. The state’s efforts in establishing a unique Indonesian civil procedural law can be seen through the Indonesian Civil Procedure Bill. This bill also contains a concept similar to an injunction. The bill, which is expected to eliminate legal uncertainty for justice seekers, still does not specify a concept similar to the injunction in Indonesia.

  Keywords


confiscation; indonesian civil procedure bill, injunction, provision; provisional determination

  Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

  References


Admin. “RUU Hukum Acara Perdata dan Arah Reformasi Eksekusi Perdata.” pshk.or.id (blog), December 15, 2021. https://pshk.or.id/aktivitas/seri-diskusi-fkp-ruu-hukum-acara-perdata-dan-arah-reformasi- eksekusi-perdata/.

Anenson, T. Leigh. “The Triumph of Equity: Equitable Estoppel in Modern Litigation.” Rev. Litig. 27 (2007):

Aruan, Ukkap Marolop. “Tata Cara Penyitaan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Menurut Kuhap.” Lex Crimen 3,

no. 2 (2014).

Bogdan, Michael. Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2010. Bray, Samuel L. “The System of Equitable Remedies.” UCLA Law Review 63 (2016): 530.

Cornell Law. “Cause of Action.” LII / Legal Information Institute. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://www. law.cornell.edu/wex/cause_of_action.

Cornell, P.J., and M.N. Sturzenegger. “Interlocutory Injunctions: A Serious Question To Be Tried?” 8, no. 1 (1977).

Cruz, Peter de. Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2010.

Denlow, Morton. “The Motion for a Preliminary Injunction: Time for a Uniform Federal Standard.” Rev. Litig.

(2003): 495.

“Developments in the Law: Injunctions.” Harvard Law Review 78, no. 5 (1965): 994–1093. https://doi. org/10.2307/1338990.

Farnsworth, E. Allan. “Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract.” Columbia Law Review 70, no. 7 (1970): 1145–1216.

Frost, Amanda. “In Defense of Nationwide Injunctions.” NYUL Rev. 93 (2018): 1065. Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. Seventh Edition. Minnesota: St. Paul, 1999.

Greenberg, Daniel. Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary of Words and Phrases. London: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd, 2008. Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan

Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

———. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005. Khairandy, Ridwan. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2017.

Koh, Daniel. Law and Practice of Injunctions in Singapore. Singapore: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 2004. Kull, Andrew. “Rescission and Restitution.” The Business Lawyer 61, no. 2 (2006): 569–88.

Lampe, Joanna R. “Nationwide Injunctions: Law, History, and Proposals for Reform.” Congressional Research Service, September 2021.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Jakarta: KENCANA, 2017.

———. Teori Hukum. Jakarta: KENCANA, 2020.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahya Atma Pustaka, 2013.

Metzger, Eugene J., and Michael E. Friedlander. “Preliminary Injunction: Injury without Remedy.” The Business Lawyer 29, no. 3 (1973): 913.

Mohan, Mahdev. “A Vanishing Silhouette: Acts of State Doctrine(s) and Interim Relief In Singapore.” Journal of East Asia and International Law 9, no. 1 (2016).

Morley, Michael T. “Nationwide Injunctions, Rule 23 (b)(2), and the Remedial Powers of the Lower Courts.”

BUL Rev. 97 (2017): 615.

Paton, George Whitecross. A Textbook of Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.

“Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases: Repairing Irreparable Harm.” University of Utah College of Law Research Paper 520 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4205317.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1738 K/Sip/1977 perihal Kasasi Ny. Ng. Djenalmashur, Ny. Painah, Lim Liang Ting, dan Pek Sek Hun (Mahkamah Agung June 5, 1978).

Ramadhan, Ardito. “Baleg DPR Tetapkan 40 RUU Prolegnas Prioritas 2022, Ini Daftarnya.” KOMPAS.com, December 6, 2021. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/12/06/21173181/baleg-dpr-tetapkan-40- ruu-prolegnas-prioritas-2022-ini-daftarnya.

Rendleman, Doug. “The Inadequate Remedy at Law Prerequisite for an Injunction.” U. Fla. L. Rev. 33 (1980):

Situmorang, Mosgan. Laporan Penelitian Hukum Tentang Penyederhaan Proses Peradilan. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum Nasional, 2009.

Solimine, Michael E. “The Renaissance of Permissive Interlocutory Appeals and the Demise of the Collateral Order Doctrine.” Akron L. Rev. 53 (2019): 607.

Sugitha, Made Yoga Pramana, and I Nyoman Suyatna. “Tinjauan Terhadap Eksekusi Putusan Yang Menghukum Orang Untuk Melaksanakan Suatu Perbuatan.” Kertha Wicara 9, no. 1 (2019).

Thomas, Tracy A. “Proportionality and the Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence of Remedies.” Hastings Law Journal 59, no. 1 (2008).

Ulen, Thomas S. “The Efficiency of Specific Performance: Toward a Unified Theory of Contract Remedies.”

Michigan Law Review 83, no. 2 (1984): 341–403.

Wong, Adrian. Interlocutory Injunctions. Second Edition. Utopia Press Pte Ltd, 2010.

Wright, Charles Alan. “The Law of Remedies as a Social Institution.” University of Detroit Law Journal 18,

no. 4 (1955): 376.


  Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 950 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 748 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 1152 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.15-32

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Anom Manacika Mahawijaya I Gusti Ngurah, Febrilian Dame Nuraldi, Michael Sebastian Chang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

         JournalStories Main logo

Complete list


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic