Quo Vadis Komisi Nasional Disabilitas?

Yeni Rosdianti

doi:10.30641/ham.2021.12.209-226

Quo Vadis Komisi Nasional Disabilitas?

Yeni Rosdianti

Abstract

Pengesahan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 68 Tahun 2020 tentang Komisi Nasional Disabilitas telah menimbulkan kekhawatiran di kalangan pegiat disabilitas secara nasional. Penempatan Sekretariat Komisi Nasional Disabilitas di bawah Kementerian Sosial ini memunculkan kembali pertentangan tentang konsep disabilitas sebagai urusan sosial terhadap konsep disabilitas sebagai urusan hak asasi manusia. Makalah ini menggunakan tinjauan yuridis normatif yang menerapkan pendekatan deduktif dalam menganalisis data dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Makalah ini menguraikan pendekatan berbasis hak asasi manusia dalam menelaah pembentukan Komisi Nasional Disabilitas sebagaimana diamanatkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Selain itu, telaah ini juga merujuk pada konsep yang terbaru dan komprehensif dari United Nations Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) serta Prinsip-prinsip Paris (Paris Principles) sebagai ‘soft law’ yang secara khusus berisi ketentuan pembentukan Lembaga Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. Studi ini menemukan bahwa Peraturan Presiden Nomor 68 Tahun 2020 tentang Komisi Nasional Disabilitas (KND) kurang sejalan dengan tujuan keseluruhan pendekatan disabilitas berbasis hak asasi manusia. Selain itu, makalah ini menyarankan untuk memperkuat KND melalui mandat yang luas yang menetapkan komposisi dan lingkup kompetensinya, dengan mempertimbangkan disabilitas sebagai urusan lintas bidang, bukan hanya urusan sosial semata. Lembaga nasional ini harus memiliki kompetensi untuk memajukan dan melindungi hak asasi manusia.

Keywords

penyandang disabilitas;hak asasi manusia;Komisi Nasional Disabilitas (KND);hak-hak disabilitas.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ed. Disability Human Rights Law. Printed edition of the special issue published in laws. Basel: MDPI, 2017.

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ed. “Restoring Voice to People: Realizing the Right to Equal Recognition before the Law of People with Cognitive Disabilities,” 2015.

Aucante, Yohann, and Pierre-Yves Baudot. “Introduction: Implementing Disability Rights in National Contexts: Norms, Diffusion, and Conflicts.” Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association 17, no. 1 (2018): 87–100.

Bantekas, Ilias, Michael Ashley Stein, and Dimitris Anastasiou. The Un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: University Press, Incorporated, Oxford University Press, 2018.

Berghs, Maria, Tsitsi Chataika, Yahya El-Lahib, and Kudakwashe Dube, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Disability Activism. 1st ed. Routledge International Handbooks. Milton: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Braaten, Ellen. “Disability Rights Movement,” 2018.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative research in psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101.

Favalli, Silvia. “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and in the Council of Europe

Disability Strategy 2017–2023: ‘From Zero to Hero.’” Human Rights Law Review 18, no. 3 (September 1, 2018): 517–538.

Flynn, Eilionóir, Anna Arstein-Kerslake, Clíona Bhailís, and María Laura Serra, eds. Global Perspectives on Legal Capacity Reform Our Voices, Our Stories. First edition. Routledge research in human rights law. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis, 2019.

Fougeyrollas, Patrick, Normand Boucher, Geoffrey Edwards, Yan Grenier, and Luc Noreau. “The Disability Creation Process Model: A Comprehensive Explanation of Disabling Situations as a Guide to Developing Policy and Service Programs - National University of Ireland, Galway.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21, no. 1 (February 14, 2019): 25–37.

Gergel, Tania. “The ‘Mental Health and Justice Project’: Using Interdisciplinarity to Move beyond Impasse in Disability Rights.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 71 (July 2020): 101570.

Heyer, Katharina C. Rights Enabled the Disability Revolution, from the US, to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2015. Accessed October 10, 2020. http:// libgate.library.nuigalway.ie/login?url=http:// ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nuig/detail. action?docID=4003780.

Heymann, Jody, Aleta Sprague, and Amy Raub. Advancing Equality: How Constitutional Rights Can Make a Difference Worldwide. Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2020.

Kakoullis, Emily Julia, and Kelley Johnson, eds. Recognising Human Rights in Different Cultural Contexts: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Singapore: Springer Singapore PteLimited, 2020.

Kumalasari, Galuh Wahyu. “The Indonesian Disability National Commission as a Strategic Policy in Fulfilling The Rights of People with Disability.” Diponegoro Law

Review 2, no. No. 2 (October 30, 2017):

–311.

Lawson, Anna. Disability and Equality Law in Britain, 2008.

Lejeune, Aude. “Legal Mobilization within the Bureaucracy: Disability Rights and the Implementation of Antidiscrimination Law in Sweden.” Law & Policy 39, no. 3 (July 2017): 237–258.

Mann, Benjamin W. “Survival, Disability Rights, and Solidarity: Advancing Cyberprotest Rhetoric through Disability March.” Disability studies quarterly 38, no. 1 (2018).

Nouf-Latif, Faten, Katarina Andersson, and Urban Markström. “Cherry Picking Disability Rights? Swedish Disability Policy on Employment, Health and Participatio.” Nordic journal of working life studies 10, no. 3 (2020).

Quinn, Gerard, and Theresia Degener. Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability. New York: United Nations (United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), 2002.

Rothler, Roni. “Disability Rights, Reproductive Technology, and Parenthood: Unrealised Opportunities.” Reproductive Health Matters 25, no. 50 (June 12, 2017): 104–113.

Sépulchre, Marie. “Tensions and Unity in the Struggle for Citizenship: Swedish Disability Rights Activists Claim ‘Full Participation! Now!’” Disability & society 33, no. 4 (2018):

–561.

Shakespeare, Tom. Disability Rights and Wrongs.

New York: Routledge, 2006.

Sonali Shah editor and Caroline Bradbury-Jones editor, eds. Disability, Gender and Violence over the Life Course Global Perspectives and Human Rights Approaches. 1st Edition. Interdisciplinary disability studies. New York: Routledge, 2018. Accessed November 6, 2020. http://libgate.library.nuigalway. ie/login?url=http://www.tandfebooks.com/ isbn/9781315111452.

Stammers, Neil. “Human Rights and Social Movements: Theoretical Perspectives.” Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 75, no. 2 (2015): 67–89.

Trevisan, Filippo, and Derrick L. Cogburn. “Technology and Accessibility in Global Governance and Human Rights: The Experience of Disability Rights Advocates.” Journal of information, communication & ethics in society (Online) 18, no. 3 (2020):

–391.

Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Republik Indonesia, 1999.

Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengesahan Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Konvensi Internasional Hak-hak Penyandang Disabilitas). Republik Indonesia, 2011.

Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Republik Indonesia, 2016.

Peraturan Presiden No. 46 tahun 2015 tentang Kementerian Sosial. Republik Indonesia, 2015.

Peraturan Presiden No. 68 Tahun 2020 tentang Komisi Nasional Disabilitas. Republik Indonesia, 2020

Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles) Adopted by General Assembly resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993. United Nations, 1993.