Reformulation of The Integrated Law Enforcement Center Become an Independent Eradication Agency Election Crimes

Mario Agritama S W Madjid

  Abstract


The practice of implementing elections in Indonesia from time to time becomes an antinomy of the principle of honesty and fairness. This practice is evidenced by the increasing number of election violations, especially election crimes. This shows that the role of the Sentra Gakkumdu, which specifically functions to eradicate election crimes, has not been effective. The most highlighted issue regarding the existence of the Sentra Gakkumdu is the weak coordination and its limited nature as a forum between Bawaslu, the Police, and the Prosecutor’s Office. This research aims to describe the problematics of election criminal law enforcement in Indonesia and the reformulation of Sentra Gakkumdu into an Independent Institution for Eradicating Election Crimes. This research was conducted using normative juridical research. The results of this study show: First, the ineffectiveness of election criminal enforcement is caused by the limited time for handling cases, the weak institutional building of Gakkumdu which includes institutional nature, authority, human resource capacity and coordination between institutions in it. Second, it is necessary to reformulate the Gakkumdu Center into an Independent Institution for the Eradication of Election Crimes. The idea of making Gakkumdu an Independent Institution departs from several weaknesses in the existing institutional building plus the complexity of handling election crimes and speedy trial design requires a special institution that focuses on handling the eradication of election crimes. The institution will later take the form of an independent institution with prevention and prosecution functions, while. The institutional structure will consist of investigators, investigators, and permanent public prosecutors led by commissioners.

  Keywords


Election Crimes; Gakkumdu Center; Independent Institution; Reformulation

  Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

  References


Andiraharja, Diyar Ginanjar. “Politik Hukum Pada Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu.” Khazanah Hukum 2, no.

(2020): 24–31.

Anwar, Akhmad Hairil. “Peran Bawaslu Dalam Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan Pemilu.” Voice Justisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 3, no. 2 (2019): 73–89.

Arbani, Tri Suhendra. “Pemenuhan Unsur Keadilan Dalam Pembuktian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Pilpres Dengan Konsep Speedy Trial.” Jurnal Electoral Governance: Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 2019.

Aziz, Abdul. “Refleksi Pemilu Serentak 2019: Aspek Kelembagaan.” In Serial Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019: Perihal Refleksi Pemilu Serentak 2019, edited by Eko Agus Wibisono. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2019.

Bawaslu. “Data Pelanggaran Pemilu Tahun 2019.” Bawaslu RI, 2019. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/hasil- pengawasan-pemilu/update-data-pelanggaran-pemilu-tahun-2019-4-november-2019.

Didik Supriyatno; Veri Junadi; Devi Darmawan. Penguatan Bawaslu, Optimalisasi Posisi, Organisasi, Dan Fungsi Dalam Pemilu 2014. Perludem, 2012.

Fahmi, Khairul. “Sistem Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2015): 264–83. Fahmi, Khairul, Feri Amsari, Busyra Azheri, and Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah. “Sistem Keadilan Pemilu Dalam

Penanganan Pelanggaran Dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 Di Sumatera Barat Electoral Justice

System in Handling.” Jurnal Konstitusi, 2020.

Failaq, Muhammad R M Fayasy, and Mario Agritama S W Madjid. “Tinjauan Demokrasi Partisipatif Dan Peluang Penerapan E-Vote Pada Pemilu 2024.” Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam 2, no. 1 (2022).

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. Amandemen Konstitusi: Komparasi Negara Kesatuan Dan Negara Federal. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019.

Fisher, Billy Adam. “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) Dalam Perspektif Pengawas Pemilu Untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum.” Universitas Pasundan, 2020.

Fishkin, James S, and Peter Laslett. Philosophy, Politics and Society: Fifth Series: A Collection. Yale University Press, 1979.

Gloria, Reyn. “Sekilas Sejarah Bawaslu Dari Awal Terbentuk.” Bawaslu RI, 2020. Hiariej, E. O. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.

Humas Kemenko Polhukam RI. “Mahfud MD Soal Tindak Pidana Pemilu: Mencegah Lebih Baik Daripada Menunggu Di Tikungan, Siaran Pers No.77/SP/HM.01.02/POLHUKAM/7/2023,” 2023.

Hutapea, Tigor. “Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Pemilu: Pengalaman Paralegal Pemilu Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemilu.” Jurnal Pemilu Dan Demokrasi 7 (2015): 69–89.

Iskadrenda, Gaza Carumna, and Edward Omar Sharif Hiariej. “Problems with Time Limitation Regulation in the Settlement of General Election Offenses.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 22, no. 4 (2022): 499–512.

Isra, Saldi. Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, Wewenang, Dan Dinamika Konstitusional. Rajawali Pers, 2020. Juhana Ujuh & Taufik Deden. “Kedudukan Dan Peran Sentra Penegakkan Hukum Terpadu Dalam Sistem

Peradilan Pidana Pemilu.” In Seminar Nasional & Call For Paper “Pemilu 2019 Momentum Penguatan

Demokratisasi Indonesia Yang Berintegritas “, 202–16. Ponorogo: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, 2018.

Kartini, Dede Sri. “Demokrasi Dan Pengawas Pemilu.” Journal of Governance 2, no. 2 (2017).

Madjid, Mario Agritama S W, and Anom Wahyu Asmorojati. “The Urgency of the Constitutional Question by the Constitutional Court and Its Relevance to the Indonesian Democracy Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 4, no. 1 (2023): 59–74.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. VI. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Minan, Ahsanul. “Refleksi Sistem Dan Praktek Penegaka Hukum Pemilu Di Indonesia.” In Serial Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019: Perihal Penegakan Hukum Pemilu, edited by Ahsanul Minan. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2019.

Moch Dani Pratama Huzaini. “Jumlah Pidana Pemilu Serentak 2019 Meningkat Tajam.” Hukum Online, 2019. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5d9c17bd006a5/jumlah-pidana-pemilu-serentak-2019- meningkat-tajam/.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. Lembaga Negara Independen: Dinamika Perkembangan Dan Urgensi Penataannya Kembali Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

Ni’matul Huda & M. Imam Nasef. Penataan Demokrasi & Pemilu Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Nugroho, Wahyu. “Politik Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Pelaksanaan Pemilu Dan Pemilukada Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 3 (2016): 480–502.

Prayinto, Sudi. “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu 2019.” Journal KPU - Call for Paper Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019, no. April (2019): 1–18. https://journal.kpu.go.id/index.php/ERE/article/ view/146/54.

Rahmatunnisa, Mudiyati. “Mengapa Integritas Pemilu Penting?” Jurnal Bawaslu 3, no. 1 (2017): 1–11.

RI, Bawaslu. Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPRD Dan DPD Tahun 2014. Jakarta: Bawaslu Republik Indonesia, 2014. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/hasil_pengawasan/Laporan Pengawasan Pileg 2014.pdf.

———. Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Pemilu Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2014. Jakarta: Bawaslu Republik Indonesia, 2014. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/hasil_pengawasan/Laporan Pengawasan Pilpres 2014.pdf.

Rishan, Idul. Kebijakan Reformasi Peradilan: Pertarungan Politik, Realitas Hukum & Egosentrisme Kekuasaan.

FH UII Press, 2019.

Sumardjono, Maria SW. Bahan Kuliah: Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2021.

Supriyanto, Didik. Menjaga Independensi Penyelenggara Pemilu. Perkumpulan untuk Pemilu dan Demokrasi, 2007.

Surbakti, Ramlan; Supriyanto, Didik; Santoso, Topo. Perekayasaan Sistem Pemilihan Umum: Untuk Pembangunan Tata Politik Demokratis. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan di Indonesia, 2008.

Wirdyaningsih. “Mau Dibawa Ke Mana Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Kita?” In Serial Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019: Perihal Refleksi Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2019.

Yandi. “Penguatan Sentra Gakkumdu Sebagai Instrumen Institusional Penegakan Hukum Pemilu.” Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2021): 183–94.


  Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 296 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 315 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.057-072

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Mario Agritama S W Madjid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

   

Complete list


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic