Formulation for Handling Social Work Criminal Sunction Against Corruption Performers Based on Justice

Umar Husin

  Abstract


Law enforcement agrees that if crimes are categorized as serious or light, the perpetrators will be sentenced to prison sentences. There is no exception for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. In fact, Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code regulates social work crimes for perpetrators of corruption crimes. It is a question of what the ideal formulation of punishment should be for perpetrators of corruption crimes. The purpose of this writing is to obtain information related to the imposition of social work sanctions on perpetrators of corruption. The method used in this research is normative juridical. This research found that the application of social work criminal sanctions for perpetrators of crimes, especially corruption crimes, is part of fulfilling a sense of justice and respect for human rights. It also has an impact on reducing the number of convicts in correctional institutions. The government and DPR need to amend the Corruption Crime law so that it is in accordance with what is regulated in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code, especially on article number 85

  Keywords


formulation; sanctions; social work crime

  Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

  References


A.Widiada Guna Karya, Mas Putra Zenno J. Politik Hukum Pidana Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum Pidana dalam R-KUHP. Malang: Setara Press, 2021.

Adji, Indriyanto Seno. Korupsi, Kebijakan Aparatur Negara dan Hukum Pidana. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2007.

———. Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2009.

Alam, Sumarni. “Optimalisasi Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelanggaran Baku Mutu Lingkungan Dari Limbah.”

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 1 (2020): 140.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Semarang: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.

Astuti, Made Sadhi. Hukum Pidana Anak dan Perlindungan Anak. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang, 2003. Chodjim, Achmad. Sunan Kali Jaga Mistik dan Makrifat. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta, 2013.

Danil, Elwi. Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak pidana dan Pemberantasannya. Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Dijk J, Van. Actuele Criminologie. Den Haag, 2006. Dworkin, Ronald. Legal Research. Daelus: Spring, 1973.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Cetakan ke. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.

Junef, Muhar. “Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus Lingkungan Sebagai Wujud Tanggung Jawab negara Pada Upaya Keadilan Ekologis.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (2021): 61.

Liba, Mastra. Kendala Penegakan Hukum (Mahasiswa Dan Pemuda Sebagai Pilar Reformasi Tegaknya Hukum dan HAM). Jakarta: Yayasan Annisa, 2002.

Lilik Mulyadi. Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ringan (FGD) pada Litbang Mahkamah Agung 23 Mei 2023. Bogor, 2023.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1999. Muladi. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2007.

———. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradian Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.

———. Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Nasution, Bismar. “Kejahatan Korporasi dan pertanggungjawabannya.” Kegiatan Hukum Ekonomi. Last modified 2009. Diakses September 27, 2023. https://bismar.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/kejahatan- korporasi/.

Nugraha, Eryana Ganda. “Kebijakan Legislatif tentang Pidana Kerja Sosial di Indonesia.” Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 2004.

Pitlo, Sudikno Mertokusumo &. Bab-bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.

Rinwigati, Patricia. Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam Praktek Negara-negara: Problem atau Solusi?, Makalah dibawakan dalam Seminar Pidana Kerja Sosial sebagai bentuk Baru Sanksi Alternatif dalam RUU KUHP: Prospek dan Kendalanya (FGD Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional). Bandung, 2013.

Setiadi, Edi. “Pembaharuan KUHAP dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Syiar Madani (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) IV, no. 2 (2022): 114.

Wibawa, Iskandar. “Pidana Kerja Sosial dan Restitusi sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017): 7.

Yuliyanto. “Problematika Tata Cara Eksekusi Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 3 (2019): 355–356. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/693/ pdf_1.

Zunaidi, Ahmad Hajir. Asas Kelayakan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.


  Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 60 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 88 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.495-506

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Umar Husin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

         JournalStories Main logo

Complete list


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic