Regulation of Fraud in Civil Code: a Comparative Study Between The Indonesian Civil Code and Netherlands Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek

Ariyanto Ariyanto

doi:10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.455-472

Regulation of Fraud in Civil Code: a Comparative Study Between The Indonesian Civil Code and Netherlands Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek

Ariyanto Ariyanto

Abstract

A person who commits fraud will move something as if something happened and was right but the act does not correspond to reality. The purpose of this study is to examine the elements of Fraud in Article 1328 of the Indonesian Civil Code and examine the regulation of fraud (bedrog) in the civil code in the Netherlands. This research is a Normative Legal Research which is legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. Normative legal research is also called doctrinal legal research. The results indicated that the explanation of the definition of fraud (bedrog) has been regulated in Article 1328 of the Civil Code, but the substantial understanding has not been regulated in Article 1328 of the Indonesian Civil Code, fraud in Dutch civil law is regulated in article 3:44 Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek. The recommendation that the author can note is that as one of the countries adopted by Indonesia, it is appropriate for Fraud to get elaboration and technical procedures to identify Fraud as a defect of will. Bedrog is defined by definition as an act in which a party entices another party to take certain legal actions by, among others: making false and deliberate statements; deliberately not disclosing the fact that it should be mandatory to disclose, and intentionally withholding or providing incomplete information. The formulation of the definition in the NBW should be a reference in the renewal of the Civil Code related to Bedrog.

Keywords

bedrog; fraud; nieuw burgerlijk wetboek

Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Amiruddin, Amiruddin, Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo, and Rina Khairani Pancaningrum. “Himpitan Konsep Penipuan Dalam Ranah Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum 7, no. 2 (2022):

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v7i2.102.

Anggraeni, R R Dewi. “Hukum Kontrak Bisnis.” Tangerang Selatan: Unpam Press, 2021.

Anindita, Sri Laksmi, and Eriska Fajrinita Sitanggang. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Bedrog (Penipuan) Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Kayu: Onrechtmatige Daad Atau Wederrechtelijk?(Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 449K/PID/2001).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 52, no. 1 (2023): 301–19.

Aryati, Rika, Hamzah Vensuri, and M Febrianto. “Sejarah Berlakunya BW Dan KUHPerdata Di Indonesia.”

Journal of Criminology and Justice 2, no. 1 (2022): 11–16.

Aulia, Farihan, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. “Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law Dan Islamic Law Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Dan Karakteristik Berpikir.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 25, no. 1 (2018): 98. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i1.5993.

B.G.N. (Bart) Gubbels. “Bedrog (Wilsgebrek).” Accessed July 9, 2023. https://www.wetrecht.nl/Bedrog- Wilsgebrek.

Barnett, R E, and N B Oman. Perspectives on Contract Law. V. Aspen Coursebook Series. California: Aspen Publishing, 2018. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=amNjEAAAQBAJ.

Febriyanti, Wiwin Dwi Ratna. “Abuse of Circumstances (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) in Developing Contract Law in Indonesia.” US-China L. Rev. 19, no. 2 (2022): 85–91. https://doi.org/http://www.doi. org/10.17265/1548-6605/2022.02.003.

Geovani, Iwoeng, Siti Nurkhotijah, Harry Kurniawan, Feby Milanie, and Rico Nur Ilham. “Juridical Analysis of Victims of the Economic Exploitation of Children Under the Age To Realize Legal Protection From Human Rights Aspects.” International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) 1, no. 1 (2021): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v1i1.10.

Gold, Andrew S. “384385The Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty.” Edited by Evan J Criddle, Paul B Miller, and Robert H Sitkoff. The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford University Press, May 27, 2019. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.20.

Hadi, Hadi Haerul, and Safiulloh Safiulloh. “Pembatalan Oleh Hakim Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Yang Dibuat Berdasarkan Penipuan (Bedrog).” Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2022): 406–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v2i2.

Isnandya, Eva Riska. “Pembatalan Oleh Hakim Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Yang Dibuat Berdasarkan Penipuan (Bedrog).” Indonesian Notary 2, no. 3 (2020): 219–10. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol2/iss3/10.

Julie Lenarts. “Nieuw Verbintenissenrecht : Wilsgebreken.” Https://Atern.Io/Nieuw-Verbintenissenrecht- Wilsgebreken/, 2022. https://atern.io/Nieuw-Verbintenissenrecht-Wilsgebreken/.

Khairandy, Ridwan. Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan. Yogyakarta: Fh Uii Press, 2023.

Lenaerts, Annekatrien. “Fraus Omnia Corrumpit: Autonome Rechtsfiguur of Miskend Correctiemechanisme?,”

Lobban, Michael. “What Did the Makers of the Judicature Acts Understand by’fusion’?,” 2019.

Lunghi, Daniele, Alkis Simitsis, Olivier Caelen, and Gianluca Bontempi. “Adversarial Learning in Real-World Fraud Detection: Challenges and Perspectives,” 2023, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600046.3600051.

M.H.S. Lbens-de Mug. Het Wilsgebreken Misbruik Van Omstandigheden. Nijmegen: Radboud University, 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/148074.

Meijers, E M. Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek - Ontwerp. Kluwer, 1954.

Nurnaningsih, Rita, and Dadin Solihin. “Badan Hukum Perseroan Ditinjau Menurut Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) Dan Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek (NBW) Di Era Bisnis Digital.” Syntax 2, no. 4 (2020):

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v1i2.28.

Octavia, Suci. “Misbruik Van Omstandigheden As Reason for Cancellation of Agreement In Progress Contract Law.” Untag 1945 Surabaya, 2020.

Pasaribu, Puspa, and Eva Achjani Zulfa. “Akibat Hukum Identitas Palsu Dalam Akta Perjanjian Kredit Yang Melibatkan Pihak Ketiga Pemberi Jaminan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 4, no. 2 (2021): 535–46. https:// doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4050.

Putra, Elia Cahya. “Perlindungan Hukum Notaris Atas Pembuatan Jaminan Perusahaan Yang Diduga Mengandung Unsur Cacat Kehendak.” Indonesian Notary 3, no. 1 (2021): 701–18. https://scholarhub. ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss1/18.

Reimann, M, and R Zimmermann. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford Handbooks. OUP Oxford, 2019. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=cvqNDwAAQBAJ.

Satrio, Juswito. “Sepakat Dan Permasalahannya: Lahirnya Perjanjian.” Hukum online, 2018. https://www. hukumonline.com/berita/a/sepakat-dan-permasalahannya--lahirnya-perjanjian-lt5a4db425c9b56.

Siombo, Marhaeni Ria. “The Vulnerability Of Proving Fraud As The Basis For Cancelling Agreements In The Digital Era.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023): 243–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/ jbmh.v7i2.708.

Stibbe. “Annulment of Contract: Mistake and Fraud,” 2023. https://www.stibbe.com/publications-and-insights/ annulment-of-contract-mistake-and-fraud.

Sumardjono, Maria SW. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: FH UGM Press, 2021.

Sumriyah, Sumriyah. “Cacat Kehendak (Wilsgebreken) Sebagai Upaya Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Persepektif Hukum Perdata.” Simposium Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2019): 662–70. http://journal. trunojoyo.ac.id/shi.

Tantimin, Tantimin. “Legal Liability of Minors as Perpetrators of Online Buying and Selling Fraud in Indonesia.” Law Reform 17, no. 2 (2021): 149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41738.

Willemyns, Amy. “Invulling van Het Foutbegrip Bij Schadevergoeding Bij Vernietiging van Overeenkomsten.” Universiteit Gent, 2019. https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/835/956/RUG01- 002835956_2020_0001_AC.pdf.

Windradi, Fitri, and Gentur Cahyo Setiono. “Misbuik Van Omstandigeden Merupakan Bentuk Penyimpangan Terhadap Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak.” Transparansi Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 58. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v2i4.197.

Zikriatul, Aini. “Tinjauan Yuridis Akibat Hukum Adanya Unsur Penipuan Dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang (Studi Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 4 PK/PID/2019).” Universitas Mataram, 2023. http://eprints. unram.ac.id/id/eprint/38912.

Putusan Pengadilan Amsterdam Nomor 7774283 KK EXPL 19-511 tanggal 10 Juli 2019 Putusan Pengadilan Gelderland Nomor C/05/3972017/HZ ZA 22-1 tanggal 22 Juni 2022 Putusan Pengadilan Groningen Nomor 532220 CV EXPL 12-492 tanggal 18 Oktober 2012

Putusan Pengadilan Oost Brabant Nomor 6861466 CV EXPL 18-2591 tanggal 12 Juli 2018

Putusan Pengadilan Rotterdam Nomor 8247555 CV EXPL 20-321 tanggal 12 Februari 2021 Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi Nomor 97/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bks

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bandung Nomor 104/Pdt.G/2021/PN Bdg Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya Nomor 545/PDT/2020/PT SB

Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 168 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 223 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 1518 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.455-472