Expansion of Interpretation of Phrase of Preliminary Investigation Stages Through Systematic Interpretation as a Solution to Prejudicial Dispute

Suwitno Yutye Imran; Abdul Madjid; Apripari Apripari

doi:10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.341-356

Expansion of Interpretation of Phrase of Preliminary Investigation Stages Through Systematic Interpretation as a Solution to Prejudicial Dispute

Suwitno Yutye Imran, Abdul Madjid, Apripari Apripari

Abstract

This study examined two things; the first is related to the relationship between judicial disputes, legal protection, and the role of the preliminary investigator; the second is related to the expansion of the phrase of preliminary investigation stages in the Criminal Procedure Code through systematic interpretation. This study applied normative legal research methods specified on the type of legal research for in-concreto cases. To strengthen the study, a statutory approach, a case approach, and a theoretical approach were used. The results of the study found that the actions of preliminary investigator who were limited to carrying out preliminary investigation without paying attention to cases that had a direct relationship with the cases being investigated could not yet provide legal protection, because they opened up opportunities for judicial disputes to occur. Speaking of which, judicial disputes need to be avoided through the use of systematic interpretation carried out by preliminary investigator in the preliminary investigation stages to expand the interpretation of the phrase of preliminary investigation stages in the Criminal Procedure Code and its derivative regulations. The systematic interpretation referred to is carried out in a limited manner, by simply reading opportunities for civil lawsuits and state administrative requests from parties involved in the case being investigated. In addition, it ensured the similarity of the parties involved in criminal cases as well as civil cases or state administrative cases in question.

Keywords

systematic interpretation; preliminary investigation; prejudicial dispute

Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Amiruddin, Amiruddin, Rina Khaerani Pancanigrum, and Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo. “Konsep Prejudicial Geschil Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana Dan Perkara Perdata.” Journal Kompilasi Hukum 6, no. 1 (June 30, 2021). https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v6i1.71.

Aprita, Serlika, and Rio Adhitya. Filsafat Hukum. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Begem, Sarah Sarmila, Nurul Qamar, and Hamza Baharuddin. “Sistem Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (September 5, 2019): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.28.

Dewi, Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu. “Aspek Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum dan Pemenuhan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 13, no. 1 (August 2, 2018): 50–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/ pandecta.v13i1.13933.

Enan, Andarwati. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Sepeda Motor Di Semarang (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang).” COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (April 3, 2023): 2193–99. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v2i10.626.

Hosnah, Asmak ul, Dwi Seno Wijanarko, and Hotma P. Sibuea. Karakteristik Ilmu Hukum Dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Hukum, Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan. “Dialektika Penalaran Hukum Sistemik Ke Arah Penalaran Hukum Non-Sistemik: Basis Nilai Penalaran Hukum Non-Sistemik | Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum,” August 10, 2022. https://ejournal.uinsaid.ac.id/index.php/al-ahkam/article/view/4030.

Hukumonline.com. “Penerapan Prejudiciel Geschill Dalam Perkara Publik Dan Privat,” July 2, 2007. https:// www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/penerapan-iprejudiciel-geschilli-dalam-perkara-publik-dan-privat- hol17060/?page=all.

Irwan, Ibnu. “Proses Peradilan Pidana Terhadap Kasus Perselisihan Prayudisial Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Thesis, Universitas Jambi, 2022. https://repository.unja.ac.id/.

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. Cet. 4, Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2021.

Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana (2019).

Latipulhayat, Atip. “Editorial: Due Process of Law.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 4, no.

(2017): i–iv.

———. “Editorial: Merawat Hak Asasi Manusia.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 3, no. 3 (2016): i–iii.

———. “Khazanah: Roscoe Pound.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 1, no. 2 (July 25, 2014). http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/view/7083.

Lotulung, Paulus E., Marina Sidabutar, and Widayatno Sastrohardjono. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1912K/Pdt/2001 (Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia May 5, 2006).

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 1956 (1956).

———. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 1980 (1980).

Marbun, Rocky. “Keterlemparan (Gowerfen-Sein) Hukum Pidana Dalam Rasio Tindakan Instrumental Terhadap Direksi Sebagai Rechts Persoon Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana.” Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum 1, no. 1 (October 29, 2018). https://doi.org/10.25105/hpph.v1i1.3536.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 13, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2017.

Mawar, Sitti. “Metode Penemuan Hukum (Interpretasi Dan Konstruksi) Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Hukum.”

Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 1, no. 1 (2020): 22–38.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, and Eddy O.S Hiariej. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Red & White Publishing, 2021.

Putra, Nyoman Indra. “Azas Minimum Pembuktian Untuk Menentukan Tersangka Dalam Perkara Pidana.”

Lex et Societatis 7, no. 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v7i12.27580.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Cet. 8. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Rahim, Abdul, and Muhammad Ibnu Fajar Rahim. “Kupas Tuntas Penerapan Prejudiciel Geschil Dalam Perkara Pidana.” Pleno Jure 11, no. 2 (September 8, 2022): 115–41. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure. v11i2.700.

Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (1981).

———. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (1945).

Saini, Yetisma, and Febrina Annisa. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Padang: LPPM Universitas Bung Hatta, 2022.

Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah, Xavier Nugraha, and Luisa Srihandayani. “Konsep Penegakan Hukum Yang Sistematis Dalam Perselisihan Pra-Yudisial Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 1 (January 31, 2022): 68–92. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art4.

Sinaulan, Jh. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Masyarakat.” Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya 4, no. 1 (February 19, 2018). https://www.jurnal.ideaspublishing.co.id/index.php/ideas/article/ view/67.

Sriwidodo, Joko. Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press, 2023.

Syaripudin, Pahmi. “Analisis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen dan Persyaratan Administrasi Perkawinan Dikaji Menurut Pasal 263 dan Pasal 264 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) 1, no. 1 (January 12, 2021): 62–78. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v1i1.1116.

Tim Publikasi Hukumonline. “K&K Advocates Menjawab Penerapan Perma 1 Tahun 1956 dalam Penangguhan Perkara Pidana.” hukumonline.com. Accessed July 21, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ kk-advocates-menjawab-penerapan-perma-1-tahun-1956-dalam-penangguhan-perkara-pidana- lt620b112f10079/.

United Nations General Assembly. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).

Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 299 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 112 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 303 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.341-356