Execution of Trade Secret as Object of Collateral in Banking
Abstract
Laws and regulations related to trade secrets do not explicitly stipulate that trade secrets can be used as an object of guarantee in banking, causing legal uncertainty for the public and affecting the condition of trade secrets being used as collateral objects and the execution of goods for certain reasons. Writing this article aims to examine and analyze the regulation of trade secrets as an object of guarantee and the execution of trade secrets in the banking. Then, through this article it can provide benefits in the form of juridical understanding related to trade secret legal arrangements as objects of collateral in the banking, contribute literature, and can be considered by the government in establishing laws and regulations related to trade secrets as collateral objects. The legal issue in the form of a veil of norms makes this article use normative legal research methods using a statutory and contextual approach, followed by legal materials in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that trade secrets can be used as collateral in the banking because they have economic value, can be transferred, and have no time limit as long as they are kept confidential. Then related to the execution of trade secrets can be carried out based on the execution of fiduciary guarantees considering that trade secrets can be charged with fiduciary guarantees. The method of execution is through executorial titles, public auctions, and private sales as stipulated in Article 29 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law. Trade secrets as an object of guarantee have been explicitly regulated and execution of trade secrets can be carried out through private sales and auctions as regulated in the German Lending and Taking Security Act. Based on this explanation, the solution to the legal issues in this article is that Indonesia can amend the Trade Secrets Law by considering German Legislation so as to provide legal certainty for the Indonesian people regarding trade secrets as an object of guarantee.
Keywords
References
Chandrika, Riandhani Septian, “Perlindungan Hukum Perjanjian Lisensi Rahasia Dagang Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 2, no. 1 (2019): 11–22.
Dalimunthe, Siti Nurul Intan Sari, and Ridha Wahyuni. “Perkembangan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Perbankan.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 14, no. 1 (2023): 28–45.
Fried, Charles, “Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation”, Michigan Law Review 81, no.4 (1983): 904-908.
Hamonangan, “Analisis Penerapan 5C Dalam Penyaluran Pembiayaan Pada Bank Muamalat HCU Padang Sidenpuan,” Jurnal Ilmiah MEA 4, no. 2 (2020): 454-466,
Istiqlal, Lana Almira Luthfiana, and Dian Purnama Anugerah. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pengguna Kartu Debit Terkait Pembebanan Biaya Tambahan Pada Mesin EDC (Electronic Data Captured).” Media Iuris 3, no. 1 (2020): 39–56.
Intellectual Property Rights, AusAid, Indonesia Australia Specialised Training Project-Phase II. 2001.
Jaman, Ujang Badru. “Prospek Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Sebagai Jaminan Utang.” Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM West Science 01, no. 01 (2022): 15–20.
Jayanto, Dewi Asri, Zainal Asikin, and Muhaimin. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Merek Sebagai Jaminan Pada Lembaga Perbankan.” Jatiswara (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) 32, no. 3 (2017): 508–518.
Kotzur Wolfgang, Nefail Berjasevic and Marc Krischer, Oppenhoff & Partner. “Lending and Taking Security In Germany: Overview.” Oktober 24, 2023.
Kurnianingrum, Trias Palupi. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan.” Negara Hukum 8, no. 1 (2017): 31–54.
Lorenz and Partner. “Thailand Business Security Act.” Oktober 24, 2023.
Maulana, Iqbal, Sufirman Rahman, and Andika Prawira. “Efektifitas Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dengan Penjualan Dibawah Tangan.” Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–20.
Mopeng, Andhika, “Hak-Hak Kebendaan Yang Bersifat Jaminan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata,” Lex Crimen 6, no. 10 (2017): 168-172.
Nofianti, Ila Nabilla and Rani Apriani. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Debitur Cidera Janji,” Supremasi Jurnal Hukum 3, no.2 (2021): 144-159.
Oktaviyani Vika and Deci Siti Hamzah Marpaung, “Peranan Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Dalam Jaminan Hak Tanggungan,” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9, no.9 (2021): 1623-1632.
Ramli, Ahmad M et al, “Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang Dalam Industri Jasa Telekomunikasi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 15, no. 2 (2021): 215–230.
Rumawi et al, “Parate Executie Dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 3 (2022): 554–579.
Sabir, Muhammad, and Rifka Tunnisa. “Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Transaksi Perbankan (Studi Komparatif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam).” Mazahibuba (Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab) 2, no. 1 (2020): 80–97.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy, “Hak Jaminan dan Kepailitan,” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 11, no.2 (2000): 5-10.
Soegianto, Diah Sulistiyani, and Muhammad Junaidi. “Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusa Dalam Kajian Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusa.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (2019): 208–219.
Stief, Marco. “IP As A Means Of Securing A Loan Under German Loan.” Oktober 24, 2023.
Suwandi, Dimas Nur Arif Putra. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bank Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Peringkat Kedua Dalam Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan.” Media Iuris 1, no. 3 (2018): 420–438.
Theixar, Regina Natalie, and I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana. “Subjek Hukum Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Rahasia Dagang, Trips Agreement Dan UTSA.” Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 12 (2019): 1–13.
Ummah, Zaimatul. “Eksekusi Hak Merek Sebagai Jaminan Tambahan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank.” Ajudikasi 2, no.1 2021: 1-16.
Usanti, Trisandini P and Abdul Somad. Hukum Perbankan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgelijk Wetboek).
Presiden Republik Indonesia, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan,” Pub. L. No. 182 (1992).
———. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan,” Pub. L. No. 182 (1998).
———, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia,” Pub. L. No. 168 (1999).
———, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2000,” Pub. L. No. 242 (2000).
———, “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 tahun 2022 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif,” Pub. L. No. 151 (2022).
Article Metric
Abstract this article has been read : 642 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded : 122 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 404 times
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.349-364
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ni Nyoman Indah Pratiwi, Ryka Yuliana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Indexed by :







