Philosophical Foundation of Human Rights According to Höffe and Lohmann
Abstract
This article aims to philosophically justify the universality and the existence of human rights. Historically, the concept of human rights has evolved according to the context in which human rights are lived. One of the themes of debate is how human rights are justified or validated and how they can be universally accepted. Philosphers always have different opinions about what constitutes the basis of human rights. This article considers Höffe and Lohmann who sepciafically address this problem. Based on the philosophical approaches of Otfried Höffe and Georg Lohmann, this research emphasizes the universal validity of human rights. On the one hand, Otfried Höffe justifies the necessity of human rights in his anthropological approach of “transcendental exchange” which is the conditions for the possibility of being human. These conditions concern humans as physical and living beings, as linguistic and rational beings, and as social and cooperative beings who have transcendent interests in their lives. On the other hand, Georg Lohmann grounds human rights through a mutual moral obligation to recognize others as equal subjects. Moral obligation arises from a person’s ability to decide what is good or bad. Both Höffe and Lohmann ground human rights on reciprocity. In analyzing both views of human rights, qualitative method is used in this research which focuses on literature study. This research finds that the universal nature of human rights is grounded in human vulnerability, reciprocity of mutual respect, and integration of moral obligations into legal frameworks for the protection of self-determination and dignity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aquino, Kriselle Marie Calica. “Human Rights and the Periphery: Righting the Deprivation of the Sama Dilaut as Indigenous Maritime Peoples in the Southern Philippines.” Jurnal HAM 15, no. 1 (2024): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2024.15.19-34.
Brieskorn, Norbert. Menschenrechte: Eine Historisch-Philosophische Grundlegung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer W, 1997.
Döbert, Rainer, and Gertrud Nunner-Winkler. “Value Change and Morality.” In Moral Development and the Social Environment, edited by Georg Lind, 1st ed., 125–53. New York: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003419273.
Forst, Rainer. “The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification: A Reflexive Approach.” Ethics 120, no. 4 (July 2010): 711–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/653434.
Habermas, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.
Hearnden, Scott Robert. “Peace and Human Rights in Sri Lanka: The Struggle for Marginalised Communities to Advocate for Justice.” Jurnal HAM 15, no. 2 (2024): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2024.15.95-110.
Hedberg, Petra. “On the Performative and the Pragmatic. Performative vs. Pragmatic Self-Contradictions.” SATS 9, no. 2 (January 2008): 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2008.91.
Höffe, Otfried. “Reflective Equilibrium in Times of Globalization? An Alternative to Rawls.” In John Rawls: A Theory of Justice, edited by Otfried Höffe, 193–211. Leiden ; Boston: Brill, 2013.
———. “Transzendentaler Tausch: Eine Legitimationsfigur Für Menschenrechte?” In Philosophie Der Menschenrechte, edited by Stefan Gosepath and Georg Lohmann. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998.
Ituriaga, Anna Joceline Dizon. “Third-Country Hiring: The Case of Overseas Filipino Workers in Taiwan to Poland.” Jurnal HAM 15, no. 1 (March 27, 2024): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2024.15.51-62.
Kirchschlaeger, Peter G. “Human Dignity and Human Rights: Fostering and Protecting Pluralism and Particularity.” Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 6, no. 1 (July 2, 2020): 90–106. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-00601006.
Lohmann, Georg. “Menschenrechte zwischen Moral und Recht.” In Philosophie der Menschenrechte, edited by Herausgegeben von Stefan Gosepath and Georg Lohmann, 62–95. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1993-0201.
Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong, Adison Adrianus Sihombing, and Zaenuddin Hudi Prasojo. “Human Rights and Views of the Catholic Church under Habermas Discourse Theory.” Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 7, no. 2 (December 13, 2023): 154–75. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v7i2.38464.
Nunner-Winkler, Gertrud. “Moral Progress: Improvement of Moral Concepts, Refinements of Moral Motivation.” Analyse & Kritik 42, no. 1 (May 1, 2020): 171–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2020-0007.
———. “Moralischer Universalismus – kultureller Relativismus. Zum Problem der Menschenrechte.” In Universale Menschenrechte im Widerspruch der Kulturen, Band II der Symposium Das eine Menschenrecht für alle und die vielen Lebensformen, edited by Johannes Hoffmann. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag für Interkulturelle Kommunikation, 1991.
———. “Two Moralities? A Critical Discussion of an Ethic of Care and Responsibility versus an Ethic of Rights and Justice.” In An Ethic of Care, edited by Mary Jeanne Larrabee, 143–56. New York: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760192.
Rutherford, Nat, and Michael Bacon. “Rorty, Richard.” In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, edited by Mortimer Sellers and Stephan Kirste, 3135–41. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_325.
Suárez Müller, Fernando. “The Hierarchy of Human Rights and the Transcendental System of Right.” Human Rights Review 20, no. 1 (March 2019): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0537-z.
Article Metric
Abstract this article has been read : 600 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded : 233 times
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2025.16.1-10
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung, Adrianus Yohanes Mai, Winibaldus Stefanus Mere

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal HAM Indexed by :








