Email this article Institutional Isomorphism at LPSK in Enforcement of The Rights to Psychosocial Rehabilitation for Victims of Crime in Indonesia
Abstract
This study explains how isomorphism develops in the Indonesian Witness and Victim Protection Agency (Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban-LPSK) and contributes to stronger coordination among institutions in administering psychological services for crime victims in Indonesia. This study employs an organizational sociology approach with an isomorphism perspective to determine the robustness of institutions' roles and relationships in providing psychosocial care to crime victims. Using the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) in conjunction with Textual Network Analysis (TNA), this study discovered that coercive isomorphism in government organizations is the primary driving factor behind mimetic and normative isomorphism, whereas stereotyped isomorphism drives the private sector. Isomorphism emerges to give psychosocial services to victims of criminal crimes, namely as a result of reinforcement from Law Number 31 of 2014 on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. This reinforcement prompted mimetic isomorphism in many forms of cooperation, and as a result, normatively, it is feasible to claim that LPSK has evolved into a professional institution in delivering psychological rights services to victims of criminal crimes. Furthermore, this study makes recommendations on the role of state institutions and cooperative institutions in satisfying the rights of crime victims in Indonesia, particularly psychosocial assistance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Akbar, R. “Institutional Isomorphism Dalam Akuntabilitas Kinerja Sektor Publik Di Indonesia.” Ebnews Fakultas Ekonomika Dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 32-34.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2007.
Ashworth, R., G. Boyne, and R. Delbridge. “Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19, no. 1 (November 13, 2007): 165–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum038.
Azmi, Miftahudin “Protection of Human Rights Victims of Sexual Violence Through Maqasid Al-Shari’ah: A Case in Batu City Indonesia” Jurnal HAM 13, No. 3 (Dec, 2022): 613-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.613-630
Barton, Richard, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services in Community Support Systems: A Review of Outcomes and Policy Recommendations, Psychiatric Services Vol 50 No. 4, (Apr 1, 1999): 525-534, https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.50.4.525
Creswell, J W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2013. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=EbogAQAAQBAJ.
DiMaggio, Paul J. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge: MA: Ballinger Pub, 1988.
Hardjosoekarto, Sudarsono. Krisis Di Mata Presiden: Kaidah Berfikir Sistem Para Pemimpin Bangsa. Yogyakarta: Mata Bangsa, 2003. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9uHsAAAAMAAJ.
Marshall, Catherine, and Gretchen B Rossman. Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, 1989.
Mawati, Eprina, Lies Sulistiani, and Agus Takariawan. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Mengenai Rehabilitasi Psikososial Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” JURNAL BELO 5, no. 2 (May 17, 2020): 34–56. https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol5issue2page34-56.
Merriam, S.B. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey-Bass: San Francis-co, 1988.
Muhammaditya, Nur, Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto, One Herwantoko, Yulia Gita Fany, and Mahari Is Subangun. “Institutional Divergence of Digital Item Bank Management in Bureaucratic Hybridization: An Application of SSM Based Multi-Method.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 35, no. 4 (August 2022): 527–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09579-4.
Rhoades, G, and B Sporn. “Quality Assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and Political Economic Framing of Higher Education Policy.” Higher Education 43, no. 3 (2002): 355–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014659908601.
Segev, Elad. “Textual Network Analysis: Detecting Prevailing Themes and Biases in International News and Social Media.” Sociology Compass 14, no. 4 (April 2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12779.
Semendawai, Abdul Haris. “Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Antara Tanggung Jawab Hukum, Pemenuhan Hak Dan Perlindungannya”. Jurnal Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, 2 no. 1 (2012): 5-17.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.
Tasi, Riri, “Improving The Quality of Public Service Through Beucratic Reformation: Human Right Perspectives”, Jurnal HAM 13, No. 3 (Dec, 2022): 589-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.589-602.
Utomo, Puguh Prasetyo. "Institutionalized Resistance? Public School Responses to Contradictory Institutional Logics". Doctoral Dissertations at the University of Agder 34, (2021): 103-104
Article Metric
Abstract this article has been read : 129 timesPDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 98 times
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2023.14.39-54
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Mahari Is Subangun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal HAM Indexed by :
Jurnal HAM Statistic