Paradigm of Application of The No Work No Pay Principle in Determining Process Wages

Syahwal - Syahwal

  Abstract


The principle of no work no pay is a legal principle in labor law whose content shows the relationship between wages and work in an employment relationship. That means workers will not get paid if they do not work. The legal principle is frequently applied by courts in determining wages for workers whose employment relationship have been terminated so that workers lose their rights to process wages. With a non-doctrinal study that uses court decisions, this research examines the legal considerations of the panel of judges in applying the principle of no work no pay when determining whether to give wages to workers whose employment relationship has been terminated. The study showed that the paradigm of applying the no work no pay principle is still focused on the positivist mindset, which is deeply rooted in court as well as in the process of legal reasoning by the panel of judges. So that workers who do not work are considered as a single legal fact without other legal facts that accompany it.

  Keywords


judiciary; termination of employment; process wages

  Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

  References


Amarini, Indriati. “Implementation of Judicial Activism in Judge’s Decision.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 8, no. 1 (2019): 21-38. DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.21-38.

Arif, M Yasin al. “Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no.1 (2019): 169-192. DOI: 10.22437/ujh.2.1.169-192.

Arsalan, Haikal dan Dinda Siliviana Putri. “Reformasi Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (2020): 39-50. DOI: 10.30641/ham.2020.11.39-

Bogg, Alan. “Can We Trust the Courts in Labour Law? Stranded Between Frivolity and Despair.” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 38, no. 2 (2022): 103-36. DOI: 10.54648/ ijcl2022011.

Cole, Alyson dan Estelle Ferrarese. “How Capitalism Forms our Lives.” Journal for Cultural Research 22, no.

(2018): 105-112. DOI: 10.1080/14797585.2018.1461597.

Collins, Hugh, KD Ewing, dan Aileen McColgan. Labour Law. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2019.

Covey, Russell D. “Dissent and the Rule of Law.” Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 36, no. 1 (2022): 81-112. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol36/iss1/11.

Dharmawan, Alvian. “Dasar Pandemi Covid-19 sebagai Alasan Penerapan Asas No work no pay Bagi Pengusaha untuk Pekerja.” Jurist-Diction 4, no. 3 (2021): 813-32. DOI: 10.20473/jd.v4i3.26971 Doorey, David J. The Law of Work. Toronto: Emond Publishing. 2020.

Gunadi, Fitriana. “Upah Proses dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 50, no.

(2021): 858-78. DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no4.2856.

Hart, HLA. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 593- 629. DOI: 10.2307/1338225.

Holdren, Nate dan Eric Tucker. “Marxist Theories of Law Past and Present: A Mediation Occasioned by the 25th Anniversary of Law, Labor, and Ideology.” Law & Social Inquiry 45, no. 4 (2020): 1142-1169. DOI: 10.1017/lsi.2020.23.

Irfan, Muhammad, Rahayu Subekti, dan Purwono Sungkowo Raharjo. “Konsep Asas No work no Pay terhadap Pekerja oleh Perusahaan Terdampak Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 7, no. 2 (2021): 527-39. DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v7i2.37984.

Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siecle. London: Harvard University Press. 1998. Krever, Tor. The Rule of Law and the Rise of Capitalism. Dalam Christhopher May dan Adam Winchester (ed.).

Handbook on the Rule of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2018.

Manko, Rafal. “Judicial Decision-Making, Ideologi and the Political: Towards an Agonistic Theory of Adjudication.” Law and Critique 33, no. 2 (2022): 175-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10978-021-09288-w.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno dan A Pitlo. Bab-bab tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. 2020. Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Maha Karya Pustaka. 2019.

---------------. Teori Hukum. Yogyakarta: Maha Karya Pustaka. 2019.

Mochtar, Zaenal Arifin dan Eddy OS Hiariej. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Red and White Publishing.

Mudu, Pierpaolo. “Dies-non: Refusal of Work in the 21st Century.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist 25, no. 6 (2018): 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1551780.

Organization, International Labour. Access to Labour Justice: Judicial Institutions and Procedures in Selected South American Countries. Geneva: International Labour Office. 2021.

Putusan No. 234/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Jkt Pst juncto Putusan No. 1395 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021, antara Dhemes Kakung Wisnuntoro melawan PT Supra Bakti Mandiri.

Putusan No. 44/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Gto juncto Putusan No. 575 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021, antara Wardi Mohamad melawan PT Sinar Karya Cahaya.

Putusan No. 11/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Pdg juncto Putusan No. 1219 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020, antara Suratman melawan PT Citra Nusantara Mandiri Solok.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. 2021.

Ramsay, Sahur. “Asas No Work No Pay terhadap Mogok Kerja Buruh Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan.” Justisi 6, no. 1 (2020): 24-34. DOI: 10.33506/js.v6i1.780.

Rasjidi, Lili dan Liza Sonia Rasjidi. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Salman, HR Otje dan Anthon F Susanto. Teori Hukum: Mengingat, Mengumpulkan, dan Membuka Kembali.

Bandung: Refika Aditama. 2019.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation.

New York: Cambridge University Press. 2020.

Shidarta, Shidarta. Positivisme Hukum. Jakarta: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Tarumanegara. 2020.

---------------. “Putusan Pengadilan sebagai Objek Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 105-142. DOI: 10.22437/ujh.5.1.105-142.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 83-104. DOI: 10.31078/jk1615.

Syahwal, Syahwal. “Dilema Hak atas Pekerjaan dalam Kebijakan Pasar Tenaga Kerja Fleksibel.” Jurnal HAM

, no. 2 (2022): 271-286. DOI: 10.30641/ham.2022.13.271-286.

—------------“Menilik Konsepsi Filosofis dalam Konstruksi Yuridis Mogok Kerja dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Buruh di Indonesia.” Jentera: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021): 574-87. https://jurnal.jentera.ac.id/ index.php/jentera/article/view/39.

Uber BV vs Aslam [2018] EWCA Civ 2748. Uber BV vs Aslam [2021] UKSC 5.

Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1978.

Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya. “Kekuasaan Diskresi Hakim Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.” Veritas et Justitia

, no. 1 (2021): 31-55. DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i1.3843.

Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Pergeseran Paradigma dalam Kajian-Kajian Sosial dan Hukum. Malang: Setara Press. 2013.

Wiratraman, Herlambang P. Penegakan Hukum dan Penghormatan Hak Asasi Manusia. Dalam Imran dan Festy Rahma Hidayati (ed.). Bunga Rampai Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. 2019.

Wood, Ellen Meiksins. The Origin of Capitalism. London: Verso. 2017.


  Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 249 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 145 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 1956 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.179-192

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Syahwal Syahwal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

         JournalStories Main logo

Complete list


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic