Email this article Problematics of Circular Letter as Follow-up to The Constitutional Court Decision
Abstract
The Constitutional Court’s decision is final and binding. It becomes effective as soon as it is pronounced in open. In practice, however, the Constitutional Court’s decision is followed by a variety of legal products, including laws, government regulations, and presidential regulations, and some even use circular letters. The method used in this paper is normative legal research. The purpose of this study is to analyze the circular letter as a follow-up to the Constitutional Court’s decision. The use of generalized letters in response to a Constitutional Court decision is deemed inappropriate. Because the dissemination is not a legal regulation, it is not necessary to follow the Constitutional Court’s decision when considering the law. In an ideal world, the Constitutional Court’s decision is followed by legislation.
Keywords
References
Achmad, and, Mulyanto. “Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Judicial Review) Pada Mahkamah Agung Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (2013): 57–65. https:// doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11070.
Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Legality 25, no. 2 (2018): 247. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl. v25i2.6005.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Bachtiar. Problematika Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Pengujian UU Terhadap UUD. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2015.
Bisariyadi, Intan Permata Putri, Ananthia Ayu Devitasari, Titis Anindyajati, Alia Harumdani Widjaja, Mohammad Mahrus Ali, and Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito. “Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar.” Laporan Hasil Penelitian, 2016, 1–94.
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Depok: Prenada Media, 2016.
Hsb, Ali Marwan. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Neutralizer Terhadap Lembaga Politik.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding
, no. 3 (2013).
———. “Tindak Lanjut Lembaga Legislatif Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Membatalkan Ketentuan Dalam Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Hukum Perancang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan 2, no. 1 (2016).
Huda, Ni’matul, Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana, Yuniar Riza Hakiki, and Suha Qoriroh. Formulasi Konsep Tindak Lanjut Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Mengatur. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan, 2019.
Indrati, Maria Farida., Ilmu Perundang-undangan Jilid I: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan, Jakarta: Kanisius,
Huda et al. 77.
Martitah. Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dari Negative Legislature Ke Positive Legislature. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2013.
Marzuki, M. Laica. Dari Timur Ke Barat Memandu Hukum; Pemikiran Hukum Wakil Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi Prof. Dr. H.M Laica Marzuki, SH. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Natabaya, H.A.S. Menata Ulang Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia; Jejak Langkah Dan Pemikiran Hukum Prof. H.A.S Natabaya, SH, LLM (Hakim Konstitusi Periode 2003 – 2008). Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.
Setiadi, Wicipto. “Dukungan Politik Dalam Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding
, no. 3 (2013).
Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012. Sihombing, Eka NAM, and Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra. “Implementasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan
Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 3 (2020): 419. https://
doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.419-434.
Simamora, Janpatar. “Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Model Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Hukum 25, no. 3 (2013): 388–401.
Soeroso, Fajar Laksono. “‘Pembangkangan’ Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Kajian Putusan Nomor 153/G/2011/PTUN-JKT).” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013): 227–49. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/ index.php/jy/article/view/100.
Sukirno, Sukirno, and Nur Adhim. “Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016 Pada Masyarakat Adat Karuhun Urang Di Cigugur.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 1 (2020): 11. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.11-24.
Terhadap, Konstitusi, and Mahkamah Agung. “Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan,” no. 1 (2015): 511–20 Wicaksono, Dian Agung., Andy Omara, Ratio Legis Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon Dalam Pengujian Undang-
Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Legal Ratio of the Litigant’s Legal Standing in Judicial Review by
the Constitutional Court’s), Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 20, No. 4, Desember 2020.
Article Metric
Abstract this article has been read : 389 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded : 288 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 801 times
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.47-58
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Irwansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :
