Factual Actions on DKPP Ethical Decision Results as Objects of Examination by The State Administrative Court

Raines Wadi; Muhammad Aljabbar Putra; Tarmizi Kabalmay; Muh. Aunur Rafiq Mukhlis

doi:10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.71-86

Factual Actions on DKPP Ethical Decision Results as Objects of Examination by The State Administrative Court

Raines Wadi, Muhammad Aljabbar Putra, Tarmizi Kabalmay, Muh. Aunur Rafiq Mukhlis

Abstract

The Election Organizer Ethics (DKPP)’s Decision in adjudicating Election administrator ethical disputes is final and binding. This raises a problem, that is, if the DKPP decides an ethical dispute deviates from legal provisions, then there is no way to test it. Thus, the author intends to analyze comprehensively regarding, First, the final and binding nature of the results of the election administrator ethics trial from the perspective of state administrative law. Second, determine the exact form of DKPP authority as the object of testing the authority of the State Administrative Court. This paper uses normative legal research methods and regulatory approaches. There are two conclusions. First, the DKPP decision, which has an ethical dimension, is only binding on the enforcement of the code of ethics, while the implementation of DKPP authority is non-binding and becomes the object of the Administrative Court. Second, in testing DKPP authority at the State Administrative Court, the touchstone used is the conformity of the ethics trial procedure by DKPP, without including the DKPP Ethics Decision as the object of the lawsuit. This is in accordance with the current government administration legal regime which includes Factual Actions including the exercise of DKPP authority.

Keywords

factual action; testing; ethical judgment

Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Anggraini, Titi. “Telaah Hukum Atas Putusan DKPP Nomor 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019.” JDIH KPU, 2020. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/detailmonografi-6c4d54586330516c4d3051253344.

Aspan, Zulkifli, and Wiwin Suwandi. “Analisis Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal APHTN-HAN 1, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i1.28.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Menggagas Peradilan Etik Di Indonesia.” In Menggagas Peradilan Etik Di Indonesia,

–29. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2015.

———. Menggagas Peradilan Etik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2015.

Barnett, Hilaire. Constitutional & Administrative Law. London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 2002. Barokah, Muhamad Raziv. Pergeseran Kompetensi Absolut Dari Peradilan Umum Ke Peradilan Tata Usaha

Negara :Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Penguasa (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad). Jakarta:

Universitas Indonesia, 2020.

BimasaktI, Muhammad Adiguna. “Onrechtmatig Overheidsdaad Oleh Pemerintah Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Act Against the Law By the Government From the View Point of the Law of Government Administration,.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 1, no. 2 (2018). https://doi. org/10.25216/peratun.122018.265-286.

Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu. Putusan Nomor 123-PKE-DKPP/X/2020 (n.d.).

———. Putusan Nomor 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 (2019).

———. Putusan Nomor 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 (n.d.).

Dwi Putro, Widodo. “Hukum Dan Moral Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum,” in Menggagas Peradilan Etik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2015.

Erliyana, Anna. Keputusan Presiden (Analisis Keppres RI 1987-1998). Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana FH UI, 2005.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Cetakan ke 13. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2019.

Hadjon, Philipus M., Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, G.H. Addink, and J.B.J.M. Ten Berge. Hukum Administrasi Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2011.

Hadjon, Philipus M., R. Sri Soemantri Martosoeignjo, Sjachran Basah, Bagir Manan, H.M. Laica Marzuki,

J.B.J.M. ten Berge, PJJ. van Buuren, and F.A.M. Stroink. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press, 1997.

Harijanti, Susi Dwi. “Pengaturan Dan Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Etika Pada Masa Reformasi.” In Menggagas Peradilan Etik Di Indonesia, 187. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2015.

Helmy Hakim, Muhammad. “Pergeseran Orientasi Penelitian Hukum: Dari Doktrinal Ke Sosio-Legal.”

Syariah Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 16, no. 2 (2017). https://dx.doi.org/10.18592/sy.v16i2.1031.

HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.

———. “Pertanggungjawaban Publik Pemerintah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 10, no. 22 (2003). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol10.iss22.art3.

HR, Ridwan, Despan Heryansyah, and Dian Kus Pratiwi. “Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 2 (2018).

HR, Ridwan, Despan Heryansyah, SHI., MH., and Dian Kus Pratiwi, SH., MH. “Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 2 (2018): 350. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art7.

Immanuel Patiro, Yopie Morya. Diskresi Pejabat Publik Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bandung: Keni Media, 2012.

Ismail, and Fakhris Lutfianto Hasporo. “Paradigma Makna Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu.” Justitia Et Pax 37, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i2.4312.

Latipulhayat, Atip. “Khazanah Jeremy Bentham.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2015). https://doi. org/10.22304/pjih.v2n2.a12.

Lopa, Baharuddin, Andi Hamzah, and Niniek Suparni. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 31/PUU-XI/2013 (n.d.).

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019. Marbun, S.F. Hukum Adminsitrasi Negara I. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2012.

McConville, Mike, and Wing Hong Chui. Introduction and Overview,” in Research Methods for Law.

Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.

Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta Selatan. Putusan Nomor 82/G/2020/PTUN-JKT (2020).

———. Putusan Nomor 82/G/2020/PTUN-JKT (n.d.).

Remaja, I Nyoman Gede. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bali: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Panji Sakti, 2017.

Ridwan. “Beberapa Catatan Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 20 (2002). https:// doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art6.

Sidharta, Bernard Arief. “Etika Dan Kode Etik Profesi Hukum.” Veritas et Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no.

(2015). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v1i1.1423.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

———. “Restatement Tentang Yuridiksi Peradlian Mengenai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 2, no. 2 (2019).

Suharotno, Slamet, and Syofyan Hadi. Tentang Keputusan Pemerintah. Surabaya: R. A. De. Rozarie, 2018. Suhartono, Slamet, and Sofyan Hadi. Tentang Keputusan Pemerintah. Surabaya: R.A.De.Rozarie, 2018.

Supandi. Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Medan: Penerbit Pustaka Bangsa Pers, 2011. Syamsudin, M. Operasionalisasi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2007.

Triwulan, Titik, and Gunadi Widodo. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Utrecht, E. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Buku Bachtiar, 1962.

Wibowo, Yodi Martono. Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Pemberlakuan Undang- Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Bandar Lampung: Aura, 2018.

Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 323 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 140 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 662 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.71-86