Problematic in The Civil Decision Execution Process in Indonesia in Order to Realize Court Excellence

Ahyar Ari Gayo

  Abstract


The duties and responsibilities attached to the position of the Head of the District Court have required him to examine and review every petition for execution submitted to the District Court he leads. This is necessary in order to avoid obstacles to the execution of court decisions that already have permanent legal force. Therefore, this paper aims to describe the causes of obstacles in the execution of court decisions that have permanent legal force. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical method with the main approach is normative juridical. This study found that the main causes of delays in the execution of court decisions that already have permanent legal force include limited executors, limited budgets, opposition by other people or third parties, and judicial review of court decisions. In order to overcome the obstacles faced in the execution by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, it is necessary to prepare State Civil Apparatus that specifically becomes executors by carrying out education in accordance with the main functions that are quite adequate


  Keywords


problematic; execution; civil decision

  Full Text:

PDF

  References


Area, Admin Universitas Medan. “Eksekusi Hukuman Perdata.” Magister Ilmu Hukum Pasca Sarjana Universitas Medan Area. Last modified 2022. Diakses September 5, 2022. http://mh.uma.ac.id/eksekusi-putusan-perdata/.

Aristeus, Syprianus. “Eksekusi Ideal Perkara Perdata Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Korelasinya Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 3 (2020): 386. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1274/pdf.

David H. Bailey. Polisi Masa Depan. Jakarta: Cipta Manunggal, 1994.

Faal, M. Penyaringan Perkara Pidana Oleh Polisi (Diskresi Kepolisian). Bandung: Pradnya Paramita, 1991.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1998.

Hermawan, Bambang. “Sumber Hukum Eksekusi Mempunyai Kekuatan Hukum Tetap.” Anzdoc. Last modified 2020. Diakses September 5, 2022. https://adoc.pub/bab-ii-sumber-hukum-eksekusi-mempunyai-kekuatan-hukum-tetap-.html.

Hidayat, Rofiq. “Calon Hakim Agung Ini Bicara Kendala Eksekusi Perkara Perdata.” hukumonline.com. Last modified 2021. Diakses September 5, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/calon-hakim-agung-ini-bicara-kendala-eksekusi-perkara-perdata-lt614878bcc3d3d.

Jamal, Abdoel. Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Cetakan Ke. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019.

Kenneth Culp, Davis. Police Discreation. St. Paul: West Publishing Co, 1975.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Kedua, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, Mei 2006, hlm. 93. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006.

Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

RI, Mahkamah Agung. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Pengadilan. Buku ke 2. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2002.

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Rajawali. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1983.

Thomas dan David L. Carter, Police Deviance. Penyimpangan Polisi. Jakarta: Cipta Manunggal, 1994.

Zainal Ahmad Nuh dalam Siska Lis Sulistiani. Peradilan Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.


  Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 195 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 90 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.551-560

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Ahyar gayo, ahyar ari gayo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

         JournalStories Main logo

Complete list


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic