Measuring The Effectiveess of Consumer Dispute Resolution on Small Value E-Commerce Transaction
Abstract
The development of very advanced information technology has changed the pattern of trade carried out by the community. Buying and selling are no longer only carried out directly with the meeting of sellers and buyers in certain places, but can be performed from anywhere with the help of information technology. E-commerce or trade conducted online is growing very rapidly from day to day and has become a lifestyle for people, especially in urban areas. In addition to having a positive impact, e-commerce also has a negative impact, because the laws governing it have not developed as fast as these trading practices. One of the problems is related to the existing settlement institutions. Existing institutions are seen as not being able to properly accommodate consumer disputes that arise. The dispute resolution available is considered conventional and has not accommodated disputes that arise, especially for claims of small value, which make up the majority of the online trading section. In connection with the above description, a research was conducted. The question in this study is how effective is the dispute resolution agency currently available, especially for e-commerce disputes of small value. This research was conducted with a normative juridical method. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the existing dispute resolution institutions cannot be said to be effective, especially in consumer disputes of small value, adequate dispute resolution for claims of small value arising from online buying and selling. From the results of the research, recommendations are given to form existing dispute resolution institutions, especially BPSK, to increase their role and capacity so that they can accommodate small-value disputes quickly and at low cost
Keywords
References
Afriana, Anita, and An An Chandrawulan.
“MENAKAR PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN
SEDERHANA DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal
Bina Mulia Hukum 4 (2019): 55.
Annur, Cindy Mutia. “Ada 204,7 Juta Pengguna
Internet Di Indonesia Awal 2022.” Last
modified 2022. https://databoks.katadata.
co.id/datapublish/2022/03/23/ada-2047-jutapengguna-internet-di-indonesia-awal-2022.
Emir, Yanwardhana. “Wow! Nilai Transaksi
E-Commerce RI Diprediksi Rp 354,3
T.” CNBC News. Last modified 2021.
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/
tech/20210823150808-37-270509/wownilai-transaksi-e-commerce-ri-diprediksi-rp3543-t.
Fakhriah, Efa Laela, and Anita Afriana.
“Understanding the Plurality of Consumer
Dispute Resolution in Indonesia: A
Comparative Study with Singapore.”
Yuridika 34 (2019).
Garner, Bryan A, Tiger Jackson, and Jeff Newman,
eds. Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th ed. Dallas:
West Publishing Co., 2009.
Jauhari, R., Kasim, N.M., and N. M Wirasaputri.
“Legal Protection Of Consumers Due To
Default In Online Buying And Selling
Transactions.” Estudiante Law Journal 2
(2020): 53–71.
Kamal, Farizal F. Cyber Business. 3rd ed. Jakarta:
Elex Media Komputindo, 1999.
Kurniawan, Aries. “Peranan Badan Penyelesaian
Sengketa Konsumen Dalam Penyelesaian
Sengketa Konsumen.” Kompas, 2008.
Luthfi, Kusumatrisna. Adam, Adriyani Syakilah,
Atika Nasirah, Evan Fernando, Heny
Wulandari, Khairul Amri, Rahmad Basuki,
et al. Statistic E-Commerce 2021. Edited by
Dini Arifatin, Ekarip Sari, Irma Sundari, Peni
Candraningtyas, and Sarip Utoyo. Jakarta:
Badan Pusat Statistik, 2021.
Matnuh, H. “Rectifying Consumer Protection
Law and Establishing of a Consumer Court
in Indonesia.” Journal of Consumer Policy
, no. 3 (2021): 483–495. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10603-021-09487-z.
Petrauskas, Felikas, and Egle Kbartiene. Online
Dispute Resolution in Consumer Disputes
Jurisprudencia. Mykolas: Romeris
Universitty, 2011.
Primandhana, Sinatrya. “Indonesia Butuh
Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Yang
Lebih Baik.” Katadata.Co.Id. Last modified
Accessed November 2, 2022. https://
katadata.co.id/shabrinaparamacitra/
indepth/623bcfc543fb6/indonesia-butuh-
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 22 No. 4, Desember 2022: 537-550
penyelesaian-sengketa-konsumen-yanglebih-baik.
Rahmi, Yati. “YLKI Terima 535 Pengaduan
Sepanjang 2021, Jasa Keuangan
Mendominasi.” Bisnis.Com. Last
modified 2022. Accessed June 20,
https://finansial.bisnis.com/
read/20220107/90/1486477/ylki-terima535-pengaduan-sepanjang-2021-jasakeuangan-mendominasi.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. Penyelesian Sengketa
Bisnis: Solusi Dan Antisipasi Bagi Peminat
Bisnis Dalam Menghadapi Sengketa Kini
Dan Mendatang. Yogyakarta: Citra Media,
Taylor, M J, J Mewilliam, D England, and J
Akomode. “Skills Required in Developing
Electronic Commerce for Small and
Medium Enterprises: Case-Based
Generalization Approach.” Elsevier 3
(2004): 253–256.
Usman, Rachmadi. Pilihan Penyelsaian
Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. 2nd ed.
Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.
Widijantoro, Johanes. “Private Sector
Ombudsmanand Strengthening Consumers’
Access to Justice: The Experience From
Yogyakarta.” Sociology Study 2 (2012):
Wisnubroto, Al. “Alternatif Penyelesaian
Sengketa Konsumen Butuh Progresivitas.”
Hukum Online. Last modified 2009. https://
www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/alternatifpenyelesaian-sengketa-konsumen-butuhprogresivitas-hol20267?page=all.
Zein, Yahya Ahmad. Kontrak Elektronik Dan
Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis E-Commerce.
Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009.
Kemendag Catat Pengaduan Konsumen 2021,
E-Commerce Kembali Mendominasi.
Jakarta, 2022. https://ditjenpktn.kemendag.
go.id/siaran-pers/kemendag-catatpengaduan-konsumen-2021-e-commercekembali-mendominasi.
Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Pemberdayaan
Konsumen 2021, 2021. https://ditjenpktn.
kemendag.go.id/app/repository/upload/
D O C U M E N T S / T R A N S PA R A N S I
KINERJA/2021/LAPORAN KINERJA DIT
PK 2021.pdf.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Administrasi Dan
Persidangan Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan
Secara Elektronik. Indonesia, 2020.
Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 50 Tahun
Tentang Ketentuan Perizinan Usaha,
Periklanan, Pembinaan, Dan Pengawasan
Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perdagangan Melalui
Sistem Elektronik. Indonesia, 2020. https://
peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/160273/
permendag-no-50-tahun-2020.
Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 72 Tahun
Tentang Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa
Konsumen. Indonesia, 2020. https://peraturan.
bpk.go.id/Home/Details/160335/permendagno-72-tahun-2020.
PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK
INDONESIA NOMOR 71 TAHUN 2019
TENTANG PENYELENGGARAAN
SISTEM DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK.
Indonesia, 2019. https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/
FullText/2019/71TAHUN2019PP.pdf.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor
Tahun 2019 Tentang Perdagangan Melalui
Sistem Elektronik. Indonesia, 2019. https://
peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/126143/ppno-80-tahun-2019.
“Perkembangan Online Dispute Resplution (ODR)
Di Indonesia.” Accessed November 2, 2022.
https://pshk.or.id/dokumen/8082.
“Statistik Telekomunikasi Indonesia 2020.”
Last modified 2021. https://www.
bps.go.id/publication/2021/10/11/
e03aca1e6ae93396ee660328/statistiktelekomunikasi-indonesia-2020.html.
UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA
NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG
INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI
ELEKTRONIK. Indonesia, 2008. https://www.
dpr.go.id/doksetjen/dokumen/-Regulasi-UU.-
No.-11-Tahun-2008-Tentang-Informasi-danTransaksi-Elektronik-1552380483.pdf.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8
Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Indonesia, 1999. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/
Home/Details/45288/uu-no-8-tahun-1999.
Article Metric
Abstract this article has been read : 407 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded : 226 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 1278 times
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.537-550
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mosgan Situmorang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :