Effectiveness of Social Work Sanction as a Substitute for Imprisonment in The Perspective of Sentencing Purposes

Emaliawati Emaliawati; Bonarsius Saragih; Aji Mulyana

doi:10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.325-336

Effectiveness of Social Work Sanction as a Substitute for Imprisonment in The Perspective of Sentencing Purposes

Emaliawati Emaliawati, Bonarsius Saragih, Aji Mulyana

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Imprisonment is a criminal sanction that eliminates the freedom of perpetrators with the aim of providing a deterrent effect so as not to commit criminal acts and improve behavior in order to become better human beings. In this study, problems were formulated regarding the effectiveness of social work sanctions as a substitute for imprisonment from the perspective of sentencing purposes. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with descriptive-analytical research specifications. The data used are primary data obtained through an analytical study of applicable laws, followed by concepts that have been carried out, and secondary data obtained through literature studies (references from various countries that have imposed social work sanctions), which are then analyzed utilizing a comparison between primary and secondary data qualitatively. From the study results the issue regarding the effectiveness of social work sanction as a substitute for imprisonment focuses on changing the behavior of the convict in reducing the level of crime in society and the effectiveness of social work punishment for criminals associated with the purpose of sentencing, it is used as an alternative for sentencing that is in line with the purpose of sentencing itself.

Keywords

social work; imprisonment; sentencing

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abidin, Moch Zainal. “Pidana Bersyarat Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Fikih.” Al-Jinâyah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 1, no. 2 (2015): 458–97.

Aisyah, S. “Pengembangan Ide Kerja Sosial Sebagai Bentuk Pidana Alternatif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia 14, no. 1 (2018): 25–42.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Dengan Pidana Penjara. Semarang: Badan Penerbit, Universitas Diponegoro, 1994.

Arif, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Astuti, Laras. “Eksistensi Keberadaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 17, no. 1 (2017): 21–28.

Bakhri, Syaiful. Perkembangan Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2009.

Enggarsasi, Umi. “Pola Pembinaan Narapidana Dalam Memberikan Kontribusi Keberhasilan Pembinaan Narapidana Di Indonesia.” Perspektif XVIII, no. 3 (2013): 157–68. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v18i3.27.

Fachrurrozy Akmal. “Penologi Pengayoman: Sebuah Tinjauan Pemidanaan Dalam Integrasi Ilmu Pengetahuan.” Khatulistiwa Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 39–60. http://e-journal.iainptk.ac.id/index.php/khalrev/article/view/36/24.

Ginting, Jamin. “Sanksi Kerja Sosial Sebagai Alternatif Bentuk Pemidanaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” Law Review XIX, no. 3 (2020): 246–67. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v19i3.2098.

Jamilah, Asiyah, and Hari Sutra Disemadi. “Pidana Kerja Sosial: Kebijakan Penanggulangan Overcrowding Penjara.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 8, no. 1 (2020): 26–38.

Kamagi, Tommy Christian. “Kajian Yuridis Tentang Pidana Penjara Di Indonesia.” Lex Crime VIII, no. 6 (2019): 21–28.

Lamintang, P.A.F. Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Armico, 1984.

Leonard, Tommy. “Pembaharuan Sanksi Pidana Berdasarkan Falsafah Pancasila Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Yustisia 5, no. 2 (2016): 468–83.

Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana: “Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam Konsep Rancangan KUHP Baru.” Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.

———. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.

Mutalib, Abdul. “Efektivitas Pidana Penjara Terkait Problematika Kelebihan Kapasitas Pada Lapas IIB Sleman Kanwil D.I. Yogyakarta.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2017.

Pakpahan, Rudy Hendra. “Efektifitas Pidana Denda.” Kantor Wilayah Sumatera Utara Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia, 2015. https://sumut.kemenkumham.go.id/berita-kanwil/berita-utama/efektifitas-pidana-denda.

PAS, Ditjen. “SDP Publik,” 2022. http://sdppublik.ditjenpas.go.id/.

Potabuga, Rifanly. “Pidana Penjara Menurut KUHP.” Lex Crimen 1, no. 4 (2012): 79–93.

Priyatno, Dwidja. Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara Di Indonesia. Refika Aditama. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Eresco, 1980.

Sulhin, Iqrak. Diskontinuitas Penologi Punitif: Sebuah Analisis Genealogis Terhadap Pemenjaraan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016.

Syatar, Abdul. “Relevansi Antara Pemidanaan Indonesia Dan Sanksi Pidana.” Jurnal Syari’ah Dan Hukum Diktum 16, no. 1 (2018): 118–34.

Tongat. Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2001.

Wibawa, Iskandar. “Pidana Kerja Sosial Dan Restitusi Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017): 105–14. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0086.105-114.

Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 538 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 370 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.325-336