Reviewing Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding Formal Review of Job Creation Act: a Progressive Law Perspective

Satria Rangga Putra, Sujatmiko Sujatmiko

  Abstract


The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 states that the Job Creation Act has a formal defect and must be corrected within 2 (two) years since the decision was pronounced. The a quo decision created a discourse in the community regarding the enforcement status of the Job Creation Act. This paper tried to review constructively using the perspective of progressive law and judicial proportionality in finding solutions and balances. This paper used a normative juridical research method, with a conceptual, case, and legislation approach. Progressive law in Satjipto Rahardjo's perspective has four criteria. The first has a big goal in the form of human welfare and happiness. Second, contains very good human moral content. Third, progressive law is a "liberating law" which includes a very broad dimension that does not only move in the realm of practice but also theory. Fourth, it is critical and functional, because it does not stop reviewing existing deficiencies and finding ways to improve them. Meanwhile, the principle of proportionality emphasizes the alignment of goals to be achieved, rational relationships, steps that must be taken, and the feasibility between the benefits obtained in realizing the goals to be achieved and the losses suffered against constitutional rights. Based on this explanation, it can be concluded that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is in line with the concept of progressive law and tried to find out a middle way through a judicial proportionality approach by considering the smallest potential loss from the issuance of the decision.


  Keywords


Formal Review; Job Creation Act; Progressive Law; Proportionality

  Full Text:

PDF

  References


Alexy, Robert. “Constitutional Rights, Democracy, and Representation.” Ricerche Giuridiche 3, no. 3 (2014): 199.

Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi Dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” RechtsVinding 9, no. 1 (2020): 17–37.

Aristeus, Syprianus. “Transplantation, Legal Adoption, Harmonization Of Omnibus Law And Investment Law,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 4 (2021): 507-516.

Barak, Aharon. Proportionality, Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Bisariyadi. “Penerapan Uji Proporsionalitas Dalam Kasus Pembubaran Partai Politik: Sebuah Perbandingan.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 48, no. 1 (2018): 84–109.

Bisariyadi, Intan Permata Putri, Ananthia Ayu Devitasari, Titis Anindyajati, Alia Harumdani Widjaja, Mohammad Mahrus Ali, and Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito. “Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar.” Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Jakarta: Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal MK RI, 2016.

Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan. Mewujudkan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Yang Partisipatif. Banyumas: Amerta Media, 2021.

Garner, Bryan A. Blacks Law Dictionary. 9th ed. Dallas: Thomson Reuters, 2009.

Hakim, Rakhmat Nur. “MK: UU Cipta Kerja Batal Sepenuhnya Bila Tak Selesai Diperbaiki Dalam 2 Tahun.” Kompas. Last modified 2021. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/11/25/19390991/mk-uu-cipta-kerja-batal-sepenuhnya-bila-tak-selesai-diperbaiki-dalam-2-tahun.

Haryono, Dodi. “Metode Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Konstitusional Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja,” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2022): 774–802.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Republik Indonesia, 2020.

———. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Republik Indonesia, 2011.

———. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Republik Indonesia, 2003.

———. UUD NRI 1945. Republik Indonesia, 1945.

Indonesia, Editorial Media. “Memangkas Penghambat Investasi.” Media Indonesia. Last modified 2019. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://mediaindonesia.com/editorials/detail_editorials/1807-memangkas-penghambat-investasi.

Irawan, Atang. “Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Di Tengah Himpitan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020,” Jurnal Litigasi 23, no. 1 (2022): 101–133.

Isra, Saldi. Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi, Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.

Kristiyanto, Eko Noer. “Urgensi Omnibus Law Dalam Percepatan Reformasi Regulasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 233–244.

Marilang, Marilang. “Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 (2017): 315–331.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Prenada, 2005.

Mukhidin. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterahkan Rakyat.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2014): 267–286. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/viewFile/1488/1156.

PSHK. “Putusan Uji Formil UU Cipta Kerja: Tafsir Baru Yang Ambigu.” Last modified 2021. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://pshk.or.id/publikasi/siaran-pers/putusan-uji-formil-uu-cipta-kerja-tafsir-baru-yang-ambigu/.

Putusan MK No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban. Jakarta: UKI Press, 2006.

———. “Hukum Progresif : Hukum Yang Membebaskan.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–24.

———. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.

Rugian, Irene Angelita. “Prinsip Proporsionalitas Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Perbandingan Di Indonesia Dan Jerman).” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 2 (2021): 462–479.

R v Oakes [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103

Santo, Paulus Aluk Fajar Dwi. “Memahami Gagasan Omnibus Law.” Universitas Bina Nusantara. Last modified 2019. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/10/03/memahami-gagasan-omnibus-law/.

Sari, Haryanti Puspa. “Kekhawatiran Atas Minimnya Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembahasan RUU Cipta Kerja.” Kompas. Last modified 2020. Accessed April 22, 2022. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/04/28/10414481/kekhawatiran-atas-minimnya-partisipasi-publik-dalam-pembahasan-ruu-cipta?page=all.

Siahaan, Pataniari. Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2012.

Soebechi, Imam. Hak Uji Materiil. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Suteki. Masa Depan Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2015.

Sweet, Alec Stone, and Jud Mathews. “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47 (2008): 100.

Usfunan, Jimmy Z. “Mengharmonisasikan Undang-Undang Melalui Omnibus Law Model Indonesia.” In Prosiding KNHTN IV Penataan Regulasi Di Indonesia, 4:237. Jember: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember, 2017.

Widodo, Hananto. “Peraturan Pelaksana UU Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan MK.” Media Merah Putih. Last modified 2021. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://mediamerahputih.id/baca-595-peraturan-pelaksana-uu-cipta-kerja-pasca-putusan-mk.

Yuliandri. Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Baik: Gagasan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2009.


  Article Metrics

Abstract This article has been read : 120 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 72 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.229-242

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Satria Rangga Putra, Sujatmiko Sujatmiko

Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

 


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)