State’s Loses in The Corruption Crimes of Members of The Board of Directors of State-Owned (Persero) or Regional Government-Owned Banks and Their Subsidiaries in The Provision of Credit/ Financing

Try Widiyono; Farhana Farhana

doi:10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.33-48

State’s Loses in The Corruption Crimes of Members of The Board of Directors of State-Owned (Persero) or Regional Government-Owned Banks and Their Subsidiaries in The Provision of Credit/ Financing

Try Widiyono, Farhana Farhana

Abstract

Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 on Eradication of Corruption Crimes provides normative direction that one of the essential things that must be proven in corruption crime is the existence of “State’s losses”. Members of the Board of Directors of State-Owned Enterprise in the form of bank, in managing of the company, especially in the provision of credit or financing, are very afraid of being accused of corruption crimes. The legal relationship between the State as a legal subject with the companies having status as State-Owned Enterprises (the Persero) is the existence of majority share ownership or controlling shares by the State in limited liability companies with Persero status. Such a legal relationship has been regulated in various applicable laws and regulations that have and are sourced from theoretical and philosophical foundations such as corporate legal doctrines for example the legal doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, the doctrine of fiduciary duty law, and the Business Judgment role. Some legal problems arise, namely how is the legal relationship of the State with State Enterprises? And can the non-performing credit or non-performing bank financing affect the value of the State’s participation in State-owned Bank /Region-Owned Bank? The legal research used in addressing the issues in question is normative legal research, and therefore the results obtained in this legal research are what they should be.

Keywords

state losses; state enterprises; corruption; board of directors

Full Text:

PDF PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Asher Flynn And, Kate Fitz-Gibbon. “Bargaining With Defensive Homicide: Examining Victoria’s Secretive Plea Bargaining System Post-Law Reform.” Melbourne University Law Review (2011): 915. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Bargaining-with-defensive-homicide%3A-Examining-plea-Flynn-Fitz‐Gibbon/997d68a5ca777993baa3f85827663fbc1b18d71c.

Chatamarrasjid. Menyingkap Tabir Perseroan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Fuady, Munir. Doktrin-doktrin Modern Dalam Corporate Law Eksistensinya Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Hadin Muhjadi dan Nunuk Nuswardani. Penelitian Hukum Indonesia Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2012.

Henry Campbell Black. Black’s Law Dictionary,. Sixth Edit. St. Paul: West Publishing Co, 1990.

Muhaimin. “Penetapan Tersangka Tidak Ada Batas Waktu.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 277. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1165/pdf_1.

———. “Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 2 (2019): 188. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/648/pdf.

Narindrani, Fuzi. “Penyelesaian Korupsi dengan Menggunakan Restoratif Justice.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 4 (2020): 606–607. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1425/pdf.

Pardede, Marulak. “Aspek Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Dalam Bidang Perpajakan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 3 (2020): 337. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1280/pdf.

Piter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

Sosiawan, Ulang Mangun. “Penanganan Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Penerapan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi di Indonesia.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 4 (2020): 588. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1343/pdf.

———. “Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 4 (2019): 520. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/760/pdf.

Suharyo. “Aspek Hukum Surat Keterangan Dokter Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Era Covid 19).” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 3 (2020): 365. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1275/pdf.

Tumbuan, Fred B.G. Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas, Materi Pendidikan Singkat Hukum Bisnis. Jakarta, 2000.

Widjaya, Rai.I.G. Hukum Perusahaan. Jakarta: Megapoin, 2000.

Winda Apriani Zarona Harahap, Asep Syarifuddin, Bambang Hermawan. “Pengaruh Perubahan Sosial Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Suprema III, no. 1 (2021): 560. https://jurnal.law.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/lexsuprema/article/view/462/pdf.

Yoserwan. “Fungsi Sekunder Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 171. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/979/pdf_1.

Yuliyanto. “Problematika Tata Cara Eksekusi Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 3 (2019): 355–356. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/693/pdf_1.

Yusyanti, Diana. “Tindak Pidana Pembakaran Hutan dan Lahan Oleh Korporasi Untuk Membuka Usaha Perkebunan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 4 (2019): 467. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/851/pdf.

Article Metric

Abstract this article has been read : 460 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 208 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) file viewed/downloaded : 676 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.33-48