Analysis to The Policy of Delaying The Execution of Those Sentenced to Death is a Violation of Human Rights

Muhaimin Muhaimin

  Abstract


Human rights are basic rights of the human being that exist and are a gift of Almighty God. Human rights are also natural rights that therefore cannot be revoked by other human beings. Indonesia is one of the countries that still apply the death penalty in its positive law where the unlawful acts are considered an extraordinary crime that endangers the lives of the nation and the State. The discourse of Indonesia as a country that has the philosophy of Pancasila until now can cause pro and con problems, because there are still many among legal experts and human rights activists as well as the public who question it because of differences and views, among others. The statement of the problem in this scientific paper is “How is the policy related to the death penalty in human rights seen from the current positive legal regulations?” The method used in this study is a normative juridical method. Seeing so many convicts with sentenced to death who have not been executed, it can be said that the State has committed human rights crimes (against convicts with sentenced to death), because they have served the sentence for the 2nd (second) time, namely the Imprisonment and Death Penalty. The implementation of Restorative Justice is possible to be executed as a legal breakthrough, where it becomes a solution to avoid human rights violations that can occur within the time of the delay of the death penalty. The National Commission for Human Rights (the Komnas HAM) as a representative of the Government is expected to be more aggressive in protection efforts.


  Keywords


human rights; dead execusion delay; legal breakthrough

  Full Text:

PDF

  References


Adnan Buyung Nasution, Ramadhan Karta Hadimadja, Nina Pane Budiarto. Pergaulan Tanpa Henti. Jakarta: Aksara Karunia, 2004.

Alkostar, Artidjo. Pidato Douglas W Cassel, Hukum HAM Internasional, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Northwestern (NU) 17 September 2001 Terpetik Dalam Artidjo Alkostar. Yogyakarta, 2004.

Arief, Amelia. “Problematika Penjatuhan Hukum Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif HAM Dan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 19, no. 1 (2019): 92.

B.N. Marbun. Kamus Politik. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1996.

Brata, Roby Arya. “Pro Kontra Hukuman Mati (Bagi Pelaku Kejahatan Narkoba).” setkab.id. Last modified 2015. Diakses Februari 7, 2022. https://setkab.go.id/pro-kontra-hukuman-mati-bagi-pelaku-kejahatan-narkoba/.

Chaplin, James P. Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.

DPR RI. “Rancangan Undang-Undang 2019 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA.” hukumonline.com. Diakses Februari 21, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/17797/rancangan-undang-undang-2019#!

Garner, Bryan A. Black Law Dictionary. Indiana: Harvard Law, 2017.

Hamid, Usman. “Vonis Mati Meningkat, Indonesia Melawan Arus Global.” tirto.id.

Harkisnowo, Harkristuti. “Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia.” KHN Newsletter. Jakarta, 2003.

Ikhwanuddin. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Perantara Jual Beli Narkotika Yang Disertai Dengan Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan Nomor 594/PID.SUS/2015?PN.TJB).” Jurnal Prointegegrita 2, no. 1 (2018): 50.

Jiang, Na. Wrongful Convictions in China: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives,. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2016.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. “Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” mkri.id. Last modified 2015. Diakses Februari 7, 2022. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=11779.

Khalisotussurur, Lilis. “Peninjauan Kembali Boleh Dua Kali untuk Keadaan Tertentu.” gressnews. Last modified 2015. Diakses Februari 7, 2022. https://www.gresnews.com/berita/hukum/100573-peninjauan-kembali-boleh-dua-kali-untuk-keadaan-tertentu/.

Kholiq, M. Abdul. “Kontroversi Hukuman Mati Dan Kebijakan Regulasinya Dalam RUU KUHP (Studi Komparatif Menurut Hukum Islam).” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 14, no. 2 (2007): 186.

Ki-Moon, Ban. “Berpaling Dari Hukuman Mati: Kajian Dari Asia Tenggara.” fdokumen.com. Last modified 2013. Diakses Februari 7, 2022. https://fdokumen.com/document/berpaling-dari-hukuman-mati-indonesiamoving-permasalahan-opini-publik.html.

Kumalasari, Rosa. “Kebijakan Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif HAM.” Jurnal Literasi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2018): 14.

Kuncoro, Nur Muhammad Wahyu. 69 Kasus Hukum Mengguncang Indonesia. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2012.

M. Tito Karnavian, Dkk. Indonesian Top Secret: Membongkar Konflik Poso. Jakarta: Gramedia Pusaka Utama, 2008.

Mei Susanto Ajie Ramdan, Rully Herdita Ramadhani. “Kebijakan Pidana Mati Dalam RKUP Ditinjau Dalam Aspek Politik Hukum Dan HAM.” Jurnal Arena Hukum 11, no. 2 (2018): 602.

Muhaimin. “Penetapan Tersangka Tidak Ada Batas Waktu.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 277. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1165/pdf_1.

———. “Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 2 (2019): 188. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/648/pdf.

Muladi. Hak Asasi Manusia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2015.

Noun. “Definisi Rekonstruksi.” artikata.com.

Pardede, Marulak. “Aspek Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Dalam Bidang Perpajakan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 3 (2020): 337. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1280/pdf.

Piter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

Priyatno, Dwija. Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia. Bandung: Rafika Aditama, 2009.

RI, Mahkamah Agung. Lampiran Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 Tentang Pemberlakuan Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice). Republik Indonesia, 2020.

Risdiarto, Danang. “Kebijakan dan Strategi Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Dalam Memperkuat Ketahanan Nasional.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 17, no. 2 (2017): 178. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/135/pdf.

Robby Septiawan Permana Putra, R.B. Sularto, Untung Sri Hardjanto. “Problem Konstitusional Eksistensi Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 18.

Saputra, Andi. “Eksekusi Mati Gembong Narkoba Akan Dipersulit, DPR Bisa Koyak Kedaulatan Hukum.” detiknews. Last modified 2016. Diakses Februari 7, 2022. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3176427/eksekusi-mati-gembong-narkoba-akan-dipersulit-dpr-bisa-koyak-kedaulatan-hukum.

Situmorang, Mosgan. “Kedudukan Hakim Komisaris Dalam RUU Hukum Acara Pidana.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 4 (2018): 434. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/545/pdf.

Sujatmiko, Willy Wibowo. “Urgensi Pembentukan Regulasi Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi dan Rehabilitasi.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (2021): 95–96. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/1589/pdf.

Sumanto, Atet. “Kontradiksi Hukuman Mati di Inonesia Dipangang dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia, Agama dan Ahli Hukum,".” Perspektif 9, no. 3 (2004): 197.

Syahrun, Ahmad. “Eksistensi Pidan Mati Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia ditinjau dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM).” UIN Alauddin Makassar, 2013.

Todung Mulya Lubis, Alexander Lay. Kontroversi Hukuman Mati: Perbedaan Pendapat Hakim Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Topik. “Tren Vonis Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Terus Meningkat.” amnesty.id.

Utami, Penny Naluria. “Keadilan Bagi Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 17, no. 382 (2017). https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/231/pdf.

Yoserwan. “Fungsi Sekunder Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 171. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/979/pdf_1.

Yuliyanto. “Problematika Tata Cara Eksekusi Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana.” Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 3 (2019): 355–356. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/693/pdf_1.

Zulfa, Eva Achjani. “Menakar Kembali Keberadaan Pidana Mati (Suatu Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan Di Indonesia).” Lex Jurnalica 4, no. 2 (2007): 93.


  Article Metrics

Abstract This article has been read : 126 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 88 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.105-120

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Indexed by :

 


Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Statistic
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License